MONEY MONSTER: A Review by Joel Copling

Rating in Stars: *** (out of ****)
Cast: George Clooney, Julia Roberts, Jack O’Connell, Caitriona Balfe, Giancarlo Esposito
Director: Jodie Foster
MPAA Rating: R (for language throughout, some sexuality and brief violence)
Running Time: 1:38
Release Date: 05/13/16

Money Monster wishes to place the financial crisis of 2008 into the spotlight and subsequent microscope of a hostage situation with an audience. That decision is a surprisingly effective one on the parts of screenwriters Jamie Linden, Alan DiFiore, and Jim Kouf because the apparent madman with a gun is actually a person with whom the real audience (the ones watching the film in a theater) and the fake one (those witnessing it as it unfolds over an eventful afternoon onscreen) can empathize. The victims of the situation, then, are the sleazy, conniving people against whom, it is easy to believe, those audiences would definitely side. The least effective stretch of the film, then, is during and after the process by which those roles are reversed.

But I’m getting ahead of myself. The wielder of the gun (and a bomb) is Kyle Budwell (Jack O’Connell, whose solid performance outshines the two movie stars with whom he shares the screen), who forcibly overtakes “Money Monster,” a financial news program hosted by the arrogant and charismatic Lee Gates (George Clooney), in order to find out why I.B.I.S., a program that handles the people’s finances, lost more than three-quarters of a billion dollars overnight. He himself had a pretty penny invested in the company on Lee’s own, problematic advice on-air a couple of weeks previously, so as Kyle demands that Lee, the various crew onset and in the control room, and show-runner Patty Fenn (Julia Roberts) remain where they are and live on the air, investigations are launched into the “glitch” that lost I.B.I.S. CEO Walt Camby (Dominic West) a considerable fortune.

There are three modes in which the film operates here. The first is as a comedy, though not as the satire it has been labeled in the days leading to its release. There are satirical elements, such as the argument regarding censorship when Kyle begins to utter a string of four-letter profanities and variations on them in front of and at the cameras. It’s more of a comedy of human nature featuring wealthy, sarcastic people in their element, stubborn, wealthier people refusing to bend, and the employees of the news station, one of whom, it is heavily implied, might be standing at attention for the entire duration of the events. It’s funny stuff until it isn’t, and that kind of control of tone is crucial.

The second mode is the foremost one, and that is as an indictment of corporate culture without much in the way of exposition, although there is a fair amount of explanation regarding the “glitch,” which of course turns out to be something else entirely of the corrupt variety. The CCO for I.B.I.S., Diane Lester (Caitriona Balfe, who wins every award for Awesomest Name), is at first merely a parrot for the company lines involving a “mistake” and a weak explanation without any answers or solutions. There is a bit of information involving Kyle’s character kept close to the chest that kind of comes off as cheating, and the ultimate motivation of the sort-of-antagonist seems fairly rote in the big picture.

But when Money Monster works, it works very well, and that is largely due to the third mode in which the screenwriters and director Jodie Foster (who, along with cinematographer Matthew Libatique, takes great advantage of making a moderately sized studio feel cinematic) are working: that of a thriller from the 1990s that happens to be set in today’s world. The police are brought in, standoffs ensue, and the whole thing reaches quite the level of genuine tension (A suspension of disbelief is also required, although that should be assumed immediately). The point might be unsubtle, but that means the point is clear: If there are greater fools, there have to be lesser ones, too. It only makes sense, right?

CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR: A Review by Joel Copling

Rating in Stars: ***½ (out of ****)
Cast: Chris Evans, Robert Downey Jr., Scarlett Johansson, Sebastian Stan, Anthony Mackie
Directors: Anthony Russo, Joe Russo
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for extended sequences of violence, action and mayhem)
Running Time: 2:27
Release Date: 05/06/16

Captain America: Civil War sews doubt within the group of superheroes known as the Avengers for the first time since they became a collective attempting to overthrow an external conflict in the form of an alien villain with supernatural abilities. The second and clumsier time saw one of them creating the threat against which they were to fight by accident and ego, and now the consequences of the actions taken in 2015’s Avengers: Age of Ultron have shown themselves with this new film. It is positioned as a direct sequel to the previous movies that included the character of the surtitle, but it really isn’t for a long time past somewhere in the second act. Screenwriters Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely have quite a lot to juggle with this sequel, the latest in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and in spite of the business, it’s a roaring entertainment.

There are more serious concerns here than the ones to which we are usually accustomed (often, though not always, limited to the introduction of a hero or heroes and the thrusting of them into a generic conflict). Here the conflict arises due to the machinations of a villain who has a specific–and, surprisingly and ultimately, sympathetic–goal to tear the Avengers apart from within. He is Baron Zemo (Daniel Brühl), a hardened former militant whose motivation to fight back against the heroes will not be revealed in this writing. Let’s just say that it’s central to the concerns that crop up in the first act. After a prologue in 1991 that introduces a biological weapon of MacGuffinish importance, there is an attack that forces one of our heroes to contain a blast, whose energy she can control with her mind, away from its intended target. It still ends in the deaths of a dozen peaceful people.

The central debate, says the Secretary of State (William Hurt, making his first appearance in the franchise since 2008’s The Incredible Hulk), is a largely a political one, exacerbated by measures taken by the United Nations to police the Avengers for good. The Sokovia Accords, named after the disaster that leveled an Eastern European city, are drafted. Steve Rogers (Chris Evans), aka Captain America, is against regulation of this sort, believing that the collateral damage is an unfortunate necessity so as to eventually no longer necessitate it, and Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr., very good), aka Iron Man, thinks the Accords are necessary to keep them in check. Battle lines are very literally drawn, but no one’s side is disregarded here. When “Bucky” Barnes (Sebastian Stan), aka the Winter Soldier, is framed for another explosion that results in yet more death, all bets are off.

The fact of the matter is that Steve probably has the more salient point in the matter, and later, he and Sam Wilson (Anthony Mackie), aka the Falcon, recruit the returning likes of Wanda Maximoff/Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen), the energy-manipulating telekinetic who caused the first aforementioned explosion, Clint Barton/Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner), who comes equipped with his usual contingent of clever arrows, and Scott Lang/Ant-Man (Paul Rudd), whose ability to shrink in size as his strength is multiplied seems oddly downplayed here. On side of Tony, who has increasingly personal stakes in the matter that ultimately define his motivation, are Natasha Romanoff/Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson), the KGB agent whose persuasive ability is all but ignored this time around, James Rhodes/War Machine (Don Cheadle), Tony’s best friend and sidekick, and the Vision (Paul Bettany), the inexplicable fusing of Tony’s old, artificially-intelligent computer with an Infinity Stone.

There are a lot of characters–perhaps too many in the grand scheme of things, especially considering the niece of Steve’s old love interest, Sharon Carter (Emily VanCamp), offers her support, some sort of official agent guy named Everett Ross (Martin Freeman) shows up to be present for stuff, and Cheadle, Rudd, and Renner all feel extraneous to the proceedings. They pale compared to the highlights of the new characters, such as an African prince named  T’Challa (Chadwick Boseman), aka Black Panther, and Peter Parker (Tom Holland, whose performance is brief but fantastic), aka Spider-Man, a kid from Queens whom Tony has been investigating. These two in particular are given either a solid motivation (revenge for T’Challa) or moral compass (a clear-cut vision of right, wrong, and the answer to both for Peter).

It’s an overflowing ensemble given a healthy amount of time (nearer two-and-a-half hours than any film in the franchise so far) to find their footing, even if it doesn’t always pay dividends. The action is particularly well-mounted in an extended sequence of clashing egos that finds the heroes doing battle in an abandoned airport (Spider-Man in particular holds his own in this sequence). No one is truly in danger because their powers are about equal, but the screenwriters and directors Anthony and Joe Russo understand this, saving the action with genuine gravitas for an extended, three-way duel between characters who don’t truly want to win in such a permanent way. It’s the emotional charge of that particular scene, though, that mirrors the desire on the part of the filmmakers to set Captain America: Civil War apart in a series that has started to feel like a lot of the same old same-old. These are superheroes treated, where it counts, as separate entities who desperately need to sit down and talk–preferably without their suits.

X-MEN: A Retrospective by Joel Copling

Rating in Stars: *** (out of ****)
Cast: Hugh Jackman, Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellen, Famke Janssen, James Marsden
Director: Bryan Singer
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for sci-fi action violence)
Running Time: 1:44
Release Date: 07/14/00

X-Men satisfies threefold: As an introduction to a team of superheroes, it is comprehensive, immediately defining the character’s personality traits and supernatural abilities simultaneously in a way that connects us to their struggle in a world that rejects them. As a spectacle, it is engaging, with action sequences that have pizzazz and pop, even in spite of visual effects that might seem a little less refined (but are still effective) 16 years later. As an allegory with genetic mutation as the stand-in for differing racial heritage or sexual orientation, it may be a bit obvious, but at least screenwriter David Hayter is willing to go there. The film is, in many ways, a precursor to something like The Avengers, and it holds up now as something just as good.

The heroes are members, not of some elite squad (although later installments in the series would place them into one), but of a school belonging to Charles Xavier (Patrick Stewart), aka Professor X, who has advanced telepathic powers. His primary teachers are alumni who include Scott Summers (James Marsden), aka Cyclops, who can shoot a fiery beam from his eyes or the visor that protects them, Ororo Munroe (Halle Berry), aka Storm, who can control the weather (Ok, not all powers are equally sensible, I guess), and Dr. Jean Gray (Famke Janssen), who shares telepathic powers with Professor X and has telekenesis, to boot. The students have an array of powers, from the ability to create and control ice to, well, the ability to produce and control fire (Another can walk through walls).

Our central protagonists here, though, are Logan (Hugh Jackman), aka Wolverine, who can heal rapidly and out of whose knuckles protrude knives of hardened steel, and Marie (Anna Paquin), aka Rogue, whose touch invites some sort of allergic reaction. Rogue happens upon Wolverine in a rundown bar in the middle of nowhere and latches onto him just in time to be attacked by a pair of fellow mutants, the wolfish Sabretooth (Tyler Mane) and the amphibian Toad (Ray Park), before being saved by Cyclops and Storm and brought to the “X-Mansion.” The attackers were merely pawns of Magneto (a commanding Ian McKellen), who can control metal and whose minions are rounded out by Mystique (Rebecca Romijn-Stamos), a blue-skinned beauty skilled in martial arts and the ability to transform into others.

The real conflict stems from within a system rigged against these mutants in such a way that they are forced into hiding from the outside world. The allegory isn’t exactly subtle, especially when a heavily conservative Senator (Bruce Davison) claims, “We must know who they are, and we must know what they can do” (a statement that seems even more relevant today than it did in the film’s pre-9/11 era). Professor X believes that there is some sort of peaceful resolution to be had, but Magneto, an old colleague who helped him to build a large room that tracks mutation, disagrees and fashions a machine that can manipulate DNA to cause rapid mutation.

Hayter expertly weaves between this major plot strand (which is thankfully unburdened by any others, with the exceptions of a lingering attraction between Jean, who is Cyclops’s fiancée, and Wolverine, as well as Rogue’s increasing feelings of inadequacy and fear of her own powers) and action sequences (such as a nifty one that pits Storm against Sabretooth and Cyclops against Toad and the charged climax atop the Statue of Liberty), and director Bryan Singer keeps the film streamlined at well below two hours. X-Men is a solid entertainment machine and a promising start to a franchise.

ANT-MAN: A Retrospective by Joel Copling

Rating in Stars: ***½ (out of ****)
Cast: Paul Rudd, Michael Douglas, Evangeline Lilly, Corey Stoll, Bobby Cannavale
Director: Peyton Reed
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for sci-fi action violence)
Running Time: 1:57
Release Date: 07/17/15

Ant-Man contains all the usual ingredients of the superhero movie (Indeed, it also contains many of the same things that have made the so-called Marvel Cinematic Universe so creatively tired lately), but it’s in the way screenwriters Edgar Wright, Joe Cornish, Adam McKay, and Paul Rudd rearrange and, in a roundabout way, mock them that the movie finds its pretty considerable success. This is the best introduction to a hero we’ve seen yet in this universe (and, if you’re into ranking things, the second-best movie overall that Disney and Marvel have overseen these past seven years). Mark it down to a mixture of the kind of wacky fun that most of these movies have been missing and a serious approach to the mythology that, finally, is starting to feel lived-in.

But yes, all the usual plot elements are here. We have the Everyman with a hero complex and a unique past: Scott Lang (Rudd) was the well-meaning dad to daughter Cassie (an impossibly cute Abby Ryder Fortson) before wife Maggie (Judy Greer, one of our brightest comic actresses again semi-wasted here in a wife role) remarried to policeman Paxton (Bobby Cannavale) and Scott himself became a career criminal, ending up in the slammer for three years. The film begins as he is finally released–only to procure and then lose a job with a popular ice-cream chain.

We have the Hero’s Destiny, which is here for Scott to be an expendable soldier/guinea pig for Dr. Hank Pym (Michael Douglas), a billionaire scientist who, in 1989, was attempting to discover how to shorten the distance between the atoms (or something). In the present, he is emerging from what seems to be reclusive period in solitude, having handed the company down to his protege Darren Cross (Corey Stoll) years ago; Hank’s daughter Hope van Dyne (Evangeline Lilly) is some sort of head of research, too. Cross has perfected shrinking technology that Hank gave up on years ago, except without the knowledge that Hank’s suit, which shrinks its wearer to the size of a bug, is still active.

Enter Scott into this whole thing, because Hank thinks the technology is dangerous and simply wants to fight fire with fire. From here, we get the usual superhero shtick: Scott trains to become a hero dubbed “the Ant-Man” much to his chagrin by “communicating” with the counterpart insect, which does give us a cool sequence where he fights with another, cameoing Avenger. When the climax comes, director Peyton Reed’s shifting perspective of big-vs.-small takes over in creative ways (such as the battleground of Scott’s final encounter with someone in a different, also-tiny suit called the Yellowjacket being a Thomas & Friends train set or a particularly thrilling battle with a suitcase that turns LifeSavers hard candies and an iPhone into deadly weapons).

This all combines to make this one of the better films in this dominating franchise and just simply an enormously clever ride on its own terms (Even the sequences juxtaposed into the end credits, a phenomenon that has now dominated the franchise’s way of imparting important plot details regarding the whole she-bang, are better than they’ve been in ages). The actors all gel rather wonderfully with their characters (Rudd in particular has a way of making Scott’s abrasiveness likable, and who knew the actor we needed in these movies was Douglas, who hasn’t been this strong in years), and even when the pieces of the puzzle connect exactly where one expects them to, Ant-Man succeeds rather hugely at making us grin too much to care too deeply.

AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON: A Retrospective by Joel Copling

Rating in Stars: ** (out of ****)
Cast: Robert Downey Jr., Chris Evans, Mark Ruffalo, Scarlett Johansson, the voice of James Spader
Director: Joss Whedon
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for intense sequences of sci-fi action, violence and destruction, and for some suggestive comments)
Running Time: 2:21
Release Date: 05/01/15

It’s not that this so-called cinematic universe about myriad superheroes is, perhaps, growing too large for its own good (The knowledge that the final installment in the series will be split into two parts, releasing in 2018 and 2019, might be nirvana for its fan base, but for the rest of us, it’s a worrisome thought, given the number of characters with which it will, by then, need to deal). It’s not that the films themselves have, with a single exception, followed the same basic formula of “Well-meaning hero + generic villain = finale in which they inevitably face each other.” It’s that the stakes in writer/director Joss Whedon’s Avengers: Age of Ultron feel almost entirely insular.

This was not so in 2012’s “The Avengers,” which, for all its difficulty rallying a troupe of disparate heroes together and maintaining a singular personality, at least embraced those many personalities and giddy action sequences into an infectious blend. Here, things are more functional, purposed to push forward a plot that, miraculously, at least makes some sort of sense but feels entirely existent within itself until the end of the third act (and, of course, excepting the usual, mid-credits sequence with the end-game villain against whom these quirky characters must work when all is said and finally done). The result is a slight confection of diverting action sequences that lead to other diverting action sequences and rarely pause long enough to hear what the characters are saying (another stark difference from the first film, which basically simmered in its appealingly written and performed exposition dump).

The Avengers themselves have grown into their roles as world-savers and chemistry as bickering, friendly rivals, and each has his or her own issue this time around. Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) is still sort of suffering PTSD from his previous adventures with this group as Iron Man; he and Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo), who becomes a hulking rage monster when rankled, have been dabbling with Loki’s scepter, which exhibits artificially intelligent behavior, and accidentally create Ultron (voice of James Spader, who is wonderfully vindictive and sarcastic in this role) in the process (He wants to control the world by eradicating it of humans, because that makes sense). Bruce and Natasha Romanoff (Scarlett Johansson), aka Black Widow, start up an entirely inconsequential romance that goes nowhere and serves no purpose. Clint Barton (Jeremy Renner), aka Hawkeye, has a secret family (Linda Cardellini fills the Concerned Wife role, but at least it’s Linda Cardellini).

Whedon’s screenplay fails to do that for characters like Thor (Chris Hemsworth), who is just a big, lovable demi-god with a hammer, and Steve Rogers (Chris Evans), who has almost always been as dull as his Captain America alter-ego. Returning but smaller characters (Don Cheadle and Anthony Mackie appear briefly as Tony and Steve’s compatriots, James Rhoades/War Machine and Sam Wilson/The Falcon, and Samuel L. Jackson has another extended cameo as Nick Fury, head of the now-dissolved S.H.I.E.L.D. organization) receive even less to do, and new ones (Ultron might be a curious contradiction at first, but he’s ultimately just a metal brute with an evil plan, while Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Elizabeth Olsen’s appearances as a set of oddball twins with their own, supernatural powers are entirely because of the plot) suffer, as well.

Only some of the film’s attempts to deepen the characters beyond the face value of the thing for which they stand really work. The action sequences are only as fun as they’re allowed to get when Tony, in the famed Hulkbuster suit, and Bruce, in glorious, green form, duke it out as a kind of dueling machismo takes over. The climax is mostly underwhelming (though a new hero excites both in his Frankensteinian creation and in the way he makes everyone else completely redundant) and certainly derivative of the first film’s blowout. Avengers: Age of Ultron does very little that is distinctly wrong; it just reeks of not being very distinctive.

GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY: A Retrospective by Joel Copling

Rating in Stars: *** (out of ****)
Cast: Chris Pratt, Zoe Saldana, Dave Bautista, the voices of Bradley Cooper, Vin Diesel
Director: James Gunn
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for intense sequences of sci-fi violence and action, and for some language)
Running Time: 2:01
Release Date: 08/01/14

It might seem an odd place on which to start a positive review of, well, any movie, as well as it might run the risk of flying in the face of the usual logic, but Guardians of the Galaxy tries to be three things at once and only really works as one of them. Bear with me here, though, reader, because the one thing it does succeed at being is so significant that it dwarfs the other, less successful attempts. Because the screenplay by Nicole Perlman and director James Gunn approaches the origin story of yet another team of scrappy, fundamentally different superheroes as a comedy of five egos battling each other’s opposing philosophies.

It’s funny stuff in a smarmy and sarcastic way that might be its undoing if not for the fact that the actors in the roles of our heroes are so adept at playing the comedy mostly straight. The exception to that might be Chris Pratt as Peter Quill, aka Star-Lord, the de facto leader of the group that forms by accident and through reluctance on each member’s part. He was stolen from Earth mere minutes after his mother’s death and, even now, is stuck in the mode of the 1980s, listening to a Walkman radio as a way by which to remember her. Zoe Saldana is Gamora, a ruthless assassin and one of the two daughters of the guy who is positioned as the Big Bad of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and Dave Bautista is Drax, an assassin himself who has no capacity to understand metaphor (Things don’t go over his head, he explains, because his reflexes are simply too good).

There are also Bradley Cooper voicing Rocket, a raccoon and former laboratory experiment whose personality defect is that he wants to cause destruction wherever he goes, and Vin Diesel as the voice of Groot, a sentient tree and Rocket’s hired bodyguard whose vocabulary is limited to five words (one of which is his name). The film smartly downplays these characters’ positive attributes to such a degree that they only occasionally eke through: Peter is brave but self-congratulatory in his courage, Gamora always has the hardened exterior of the girl who was taken from the family her father killed so that he could enslave her, Drax is determined to face the man who killed his own family to a degree that places everyone else at risk, Rocket will never understand why he was made to cause destruction but definitely wants to wreak that havoc, and Groot is, well, Groot.

The film’s attempts at something more earnest than it is feel as much like half-measures as its attempts to work as yet another stepping stone for the MCU, which pop up when the film must ultimately position them against a generic threat. He arrives in the form of Ronan the Accuser (an unrecognizable Lee Pace), who wants to control the universe with some sort of Infinity Stone that does something or other. It’s a MacGuffin, basically. He joins forces with Nebula (Karen Gillan), Gamora’s sister, while the heroes call upon a couple of officials (played by Glenn Close and John C. Reilly in throwaway appearances) from the planet that Ronan and Nebula hope to destroy. The conflict resolves itself in about as convoluted a way as a confusing MacGuffin can provide.

That, then, speaks indirectly to the film’s decision to also attempt to work as an action movie, and Gunn is mostly imprecise in doing so. The sequences of escapes and combat are competently staged and shot by Ben Davis but largely unspectacular (The finale is a whirl of random motion). Even so, there’s the dominating positive force of the primary cast of characters, each of whom is such a stand-out original that everything surrounding them is rendered null by their presence. Guardians of the Galaxy is a very funny movie in its best moments, and that is because of pure, unflappable conviction exactly where it counts.

CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER: A Retrospective by Joel Copling

Rating in Stars: *** (out of ****)
Cast: Chris Evans, Scarlett Johansson, Anthony Mackie, Sebastian Stan, Cobie Smulders
Directors: Anthony Russo and Joe Russo
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for intense sequences of violence, gunplay and action throughout)
Running Time: 2:16
Release Date: 04/04/14

(Note: If you are one of the seven people who has not seen Captain America: The Winter Soldier yet, it is highly recommended you do so before reading this review. Of course, why are you reading it if you haven’t?)

If Captain America: The First Avenger did nothing to alleviate the problem of introductory superhero movies offering only a generic origin story and an equally generic conflict, its sequel does the opposite. We are already accustomed to Captain America, the hero whose costume adorned with stars and stripes is as unsubtle as his earnestness to protect American lives, and so, with Captain America: The Winter Soldier, screenwriters Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely rather effectively apply a political undertone to the proceedings. Luckily, rather than going down the simplistic road of an obvious allegory, the politics here are entirely self-contained. They exist within the Marvel Cinematic Universe, in which this is the ninth film, and the stakes are higher as a result.

Here, the major villain comes from within the system to which Captain America (and, thus, Steve Rogers) belongs, and he’s not having it. HYDRA, the off-shoot club of the Nazi regime spearheaded by his old foe, has infiltrated S.H.I.E.L.D., the government agency that paired Steve (Chris Evans in a solid performance) with the other Avengers to defend the Earth. He discovers this at his old barracks, where he was trained with the late “Bucky” Barnes (Sebastian Stan) to defend the country, when forced to go on the run by that corrupt system. In that way, the villain is not the human person very blatantly telegraphed to be a corrupt individual but an idea.

It’s a pretty neat trick to sew doubt in the minds of the heroes here and the audience who have grown to have a sizable kernel of trust in that system. It’s a slow knife between the ribs, rather than some generic conflict against which Steve must work with Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) and Natasha Romanoff (Scarlett Johansson), aka Black Widow, as well as a helping of allies (a returning Colbie Smulders as Maria Hill, Anthony Mackie as Sam Wilson, aka the Falcon, who has a nifty flight suit with wings, and Emily VanCamp as a S.H.I.E.L.D. agent undercover in Steve’s apartment complex). Someone close to them is killed, the establishment around them slowly crumbles, and it’s on the run they must go.

The film does succumb to two different familiar conceits with its presentation of a trio of villains. In ascending order of uniqueness and importance, there is Brock Rumlow (Frank Grillo, an intimidating presence), a seeming ally of Steve’s until a neat combat sequence in confined quarters. There is Alexander Pearce (Robert Redford), the aforementioned corrupt individual in power, who wants to continue HYDRA’s work at whatever cost (and his ultimate plan is even more radical). The third is a figure from Steve’s own past whose identity should not be revealed, but he shares the moniker of the film’s subtitle–and has a self-repairing metal arm, to boot.

The result of the familiarity is, admittedly, not of great impactfulness in the big picture. It appears in an extended action climax in which Steve and the Winter Soldier face off on a helicarrier (one of many in this case). Directors Anthony and Joe Russo stage the sequence as sleekly and efficiently as ever, but the most intriguing elements of their film are the ones that pit Captain America against the corroded ideology that helped to make him the hero he is. That is what ultimately gives Captain America: The Winter Soldier its surprising complexity and lifts it above its predecessor.

THE INVITATION: A Review by Joel Copling

Rating in Stars: ***½ (out of ****)
Cast: Logan Marshall-Green, Tammy Blanchard, Emayatzy Corinealdi, Michiel Huisman, Michelle Krusiec
Director: Karyn Kusama
MPAA Rating: NR
Running Time: 1:40
Release Date: 04/08/16 (limited)

(Note: It is impossible to discuss The Invitation without potential spoilers. Part of the film is about the inevitable outbreak of climactic violence, but I have done my utmost not to give away the film’s motivation to get to that point. Proceed with caution if you must, but you might want to see the film before reading this review.)

The Invitation gains most of its considerable mileage from moments of silence and consideration. It’s difficult to talk about the film’s achievements without delving too deeply into spoilerish territory, but let it be noted that screenwriters Phil Hay and Matt Manfredi are dealing with heavy thematic material here, and their movie climaxes in an even more desperate emotional state. Yes, this is a psychological thriller that adds up to a scene of extended violence, but the sense of inevitably reaching that violence is more upsetting than the ultimate shift toward it. When it comes, the narrative has earned it, and the intimacy of the act makes it all the more appalling.

It helps, too, in a feeling-of-helplessness sort of way, that the characters feel human from the moment we meet them. After a highly suggestive prologue involving our principal protagonist (who leads what ultimately becomes something of an ensemble) and his wife hitting a wolf on their way to the house in and around which the rest of the film will take place, Will (Logan Marshall-Green) and Kira (Emayatzy Corinealdi) arrive as his old place of residence. It was the family home until tragedy struck (We see flashes of a birthday party and some commotion; our imagination goes into overdrive with details involving, perhaps, a piñata), and Will hasn’t been back inside its walls since then. It’s painful, having to return to this place, like rubbing salt on a wound that may never truly heal.

It’s about to become unthinkably worse. Will has been invited to this house, which was once his own with ex-wife Eden (Tammy Blanchard), by the woman herself, who has settled down with a new beau named David (Michael Huisman) and reappeared after two years of being in Central America. They’ve brought back with them a newly found wisdom–or so it seems–borne of a desire to let go of the material things and all the usual trappings of a cult. A disconcerting and disturbing video tells another story, and the party that has formed–consisting of mutual friends played by the likes of Michelle Krusiec, Mike Doyle, Jordi Vilasuso, Jay Larson, Marieh Delfino, and Karl Yune, all inhabiting their roles very well–suddenly feels like a group of incarcerated victims of kidnap.

David keeps the doors locked, claiming local robberies as the reason why. There are a couple of strangers in their presence, including a free spirit named Sadie (Lindsay Burdge) and the soft-spoken Pruitt (John Carroll Lynch). Will questions why, exactly, these intruders upon what is supposed to be a nostalgic evening with old friends are present as company, and Eden simply won’t allow him to question it (She slaps another guest when he suggests the group’s lessons are a bunch of baloney). The evening becomes downright nightmarish–and, later, in a different way–but there is more at stake here than simple, genre-related matters of payoff to build-up.

The screenwriters and director Karyn Kusama do an superb job of following through with the inevitable, and the performances do most of the legwork on this score. Marshall-Green, in particular, is superb at allowing the audience to question whether Will’s suspicion is legitimate or his own psyche. Blanchard is very good as a woman barely veiling her own shock and grief at the loss of a child. Lynch is unnerving as Pruitt, able to convey threat and detached amiability without so much as a shift in expression. After the potential for violence becomes active during the climax, he final shot introduces an apocalyptic and pitiless element into the thematic structure of The Invitation, and it’s downright terrifying to consider.

THOR: THE DARK WORLD: A Retrospective by Joel Copling

Rating in Stars: ** (out of ****)
Cast: Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston, Anthony Hopkins, Christopher Eccleston
Director: Alan Taylor
MPAA Rating: (for sequences of intense sci-fi action and violence, and some suggestive content)
Running Time: 1:52
Release Date: 11/08/13

At the start of almost every sequence, Thor: The Dark World seems like it’s heading in the heading in the direction of being a surprisingly, solidly interesting first sequel to Thor. By the time we reach the end of each sequence, though, the screenplay by Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely has regressed backward to the flippant and familiar. This process is tiresome in its repetition, because here is a narrative that has some real potential to make major steps toward building upon the direction in which the Marvel Cinematic Universe seems to be going. Instead, by giving us all the generic beats of a sequel that feels a lot more like wheel-spinning, the screenwriters offer only the familiar to underwhelming results.

Thor (Chris Hemsworth) is now the protector of the Nine Realms, on one of which he easily defeats a fearsome rock beast to the adulation of the crowd watching (“Maybe next time you should start with that,” exclaims one of his fellows, and we nod in agreement). He’s juggling this responsibility with that of rebuilding the peace left to die by his adoptive brother Loki (Tom Hiddleston) after the disastrous events he facilitated and then committed on Earth (for which he will remain in prison) and the prospect of ascension to a throne currently filled by their father Odin (Anthony Hopkins, once again displaying credence in an underwritten role).

The major conflict here shows up on Earth, though, because Jane Foster (Natalie Portman, looking disinterested), the woman Thor met and fell in love with on Earth during his last visit, has stumbled across an anomaly with the help of Darcy (Kat Dennings, a delight) and Dr. Erik Selvig (Stellan Skarsgård), who kind of went insane after New York’s invasion by aliens. The anomaly’s source is a mysterious rift in the time-space continuum (I think) that leads her to the location of the Aether, a substance that predates existence (I think) and possesses some sort of power to do something. Honestly, by the time Jane is pointing out to the others that it will cause “spatial extrusions” (what?), the audience will have clocked out both intellectually and emotionally.

The film even offers the requisite villain whose main henchman is far more threatening and interesting. The former is Malekith (Christopher Eccleston, embarrassingly hammy), whose major defining feature is looking like a steely-eyed, poodle-wearing cousin of Nosferatu, and the latter is the Kursed, played by Adewale Akinnuoye Agbaje in a convincing physical performance that gains mileage from his silence. They are the last of the Dark Elves, an ancient race whose members (excepting a horde of expendable soldiers, of course) all died as a result of Malekith’s bid for power. It’s dull stuff and, once again, overshadowed by the continued, conflicted relationship between Thor and Loki (Hemsworth and a very good Hiddleston shine in these sequences).

After much to-do (a treasonous escape from his home realm of Asgard, a death, some more expository nonsense about a “Convergence” that I think created the universe), Thor and Malekith do battle that once again introduces a bit of creativity into the mix (The hero, his foe, and a bunch of other things around them dash in and out of different realms) before yet again devolving into murkiness (The final confrontation way overcompensates the lack of distinctive coloring in director Alan Taylor and cinematographer Kramer Morgenthau’s imagery by dousing everything in red). It’s indicative of the constantly shifting process of regression inherent in Thor: The Dark World, which is at least an interesting mishap.

IRON MAN THREE: A Retrospective by Joel Copling

Rating in Stars: ***½ (out of ****)
Cast: Robert Downey Jr., Gwyneth Paltrow, Guy Pearce, Rebecca Hall, Ben Kingsley
Director: Shane Black
MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for sequences of intense sci-fi action and violence throughout, and brief suggestive content)
Running Time: 2:10
Release Date: 05/03/13

If the first film had the opportunity to examine the reasons that its titular superhero had to don the gold titanium alloy suit shot with hot-rod red that has an arsenal of weapons up its sleeves and in its shoulder pads only to thrust him into a generic conflict and its first sequel did nothing to expand upon that potential (It certainly didn’t and, in fact, regressed from it), then Iron Man Three is the first time in this series–or, indeed, in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, considering his appearance in The Avengers was in direct proportion to how he interacts with another superhero–that the man within the suit has been properly examined. What writer/director Shane Black finds is a damaged prodigy from privilege and a source of unflappable sarcasm. It seems that trauma, which is the real conflict in store for the man, activates the defense mechanism of outwardly taking nothing seriously.

That is a quality that Black’s carefully honed screenplay shares, too, as is clear in a sequence wherein Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) visits an anomalous location in Tennessee where an explosion may or may not have occurred that is similar to a series of them that have left many people dead and no trace of a source. He meets Harley (Ty Simpkins), a young, plucky kid whose personality mirrors Tony’s own and who aids in Tony’s investigation of the scene of a crime that left five people dead. The scene is oddly but affectionately balanced between the investigation and their repertoire. Downey’s performance is similarly balanced between the moroseness of Tony’s internal conflict and his sarcastic deflection of it; it’s the actor’s best work to date in the role.

That internal conflict has reared its head in the form of sleeplessness and posttraumatic anxiety following the events that led to New York City being overrun by aliens. Even the mention of the city or the beings from someone as innocuous as a child who wants an autograph on his drawing of the battle sets the stress level to 11 for Tony, whose Iron Man alter ego has gone through an upheaval as of late. The lack of sleep has nonetheless spawned a terrific creative spike in the form of remote-controlled suits and a nifty device that summons them and has been placed subcutaneously in his wrist. When one of those attacks is upon Air Force One, he uses one of them to great effect–until, of course, it meets the front end of a semi truck (The interrupted hero shot is a constant, go-to gag that never fails to illicit a healthy chuckle).

External conflict is two-fold this time around. First, there is the re-introduction of Aldrich Killian (Guy Pearce), whom Tony met in 1999 (a meeting that we see in a prologue amusingly scored to a late-decade one-hit wonder) while working on a project with confidant and sort-of-girlfriend Maya Hansen (Rebecca Hall). He wants to collaborate on his newest bit of technology, which is the rejuvenation of genetic defects through cellular manipulation, with Stark Industries, but Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow), its C.E.O., thinks it highly weaponizable. The other, seemingly more generic conflict comes from a terrorist calling himself the Mandarin (Ben Kingsley); he is the one responsible for bombings positioned as social experiments for the President of the United States (William Sadler), who has now publicly championed James Rhodes (Don Cheadle), aka Iron Patriot, as an official superhero on the government’s behalf.

Things, though, are not as they seem, and the result is the film within the Marvel Cinematic Universe that feels as if it’s taking the biggest number of chances. Part of that is in the revelation of the Mandarin’s identity (refreshingly played as a joke that might be a barb aimed at the MCU itself for giving us such generic villains); the other part is in the action sequences, which are either creatively conceived (the aforementioned Air Force One rescue or the destruction of Tony’s residence, in which a piano is used as a weapon) or thrillingly staged (the climax, which might predictably be set among crates on a rig in the ocean but is a highlight all the same due to the welcome levity of humor and more of those interrupted hero shots). Iron Man Three is unique and risky, yes, but it’s also a lot of cheeky fun.