DENZEL WASHINGTON’S FENCES — A REVIEW BY NICK CLEMENT

 

3Denzel Washington delivers a volcanic performance in his latest directorial effort, Fences, while the magnificent Viola Davis counters with her own blistering piece of internalized acting; the two artists literally explode off of the screen. Efficiently directed by Washington, the film was adapted for the screen by playwright August Wilson, whose original, Pulitzer-winning effort was performed on Broadway by both of the leads. It’s a story about unfulfilled potential and shattered dreams and how anger can run its way through a person in a variety of ways; the manner in which Washington projects inner resentment and regret is astounding. Playing a former Negro Leagues slugger who never made it to the majors for a variety of reasons, Washington is the ultra-commanding backbone to the narrative, which pivots on the relationships he has with his wife of 18 years (Davis), his two sons (Jovan Adepo and Russell Hornsby, both excellent) by different mothers, his mentally challenged and war-scarred brother (Mykelti Williamson, superb in a tricky role), and his best friend, played with sagaciousness by Stephen McKinley Henderson. The bravura performances from everyone in the tightly-knit cast easily cements Fences as one of the strongest pieces of purely dramatic storytelling from 2016.

2

Hughes Winborne’s well-paced editing is a study of when not to cut, just as much as it is of when to cut; I can’t imagine sitting in the editing bay watching these actors for various weeks, trying to decide which take to use. Because this entire film is built upon its galvanizing performances, to cut too soon or too late would be to rob the piece of various emotional impact moments; there’s also extra-smart use of reaction shots all throughout. In tandem with the crisp and clean cinematography by Charlotte Bruus Christensen, Fences feels polished and graceful, while the restrictive setting definitely keeps the picture feeling like a filmed play, and yet is incredibly evocative of time and place. Washington feels totally enmeshed in this character, unafraid to go to some very dark and unlikable places as an actor, while the story never lets anyone off the hook; for better or worse, you are what you make of yourself in the world that Fences presents. It might not be a film I’ll be able to revisit over and over again, but it’s a piece of work that lingers, demanding attention and respect. Producer Scott Rudin also worked on the stage production, while Tony Kushner apparently helped to craft the screenplay, but only received a co-producing credit.

1

PODCASTING THEM SOFTLY PRESENTS: 15 QUESTIONS WITH FILMMAKER SEAN ELLIS

ellis-banner

Filmmaker Sean Ellis is ready to bust out. With a background in short films and photography, his feature debut, 2006’s Cashback, was an expansion of his Oscar nominated short film of the same name, which won numerous awards at festivals worldwide. He followed that up in 2008 with a cerebral psychological thriller called The Broken, before finding further international acclaim for his gutsy and powerful dramatic thriller Metro Manila, which was released in 2013, winning awards on the festival circuit and quickly acquiring a devoted following. In 2016, he released his most ambitious project to date, the tense and terrific WWII action thriller Anthropoid, which is now available on Blu-ray/DVD and via various streaming providers. Podcasting Them Softly is proud to present a 15 QUESTIONS interview with Sean, as he discusses his career, inspirations, and the future. He even presents his personal “watch list” from 2016!

(This interview was conducted via email and was edited by Nick Clement.)

0172.jpg(Director Sean Ellis, Cillian Murphy and Jamie Dornan, Anthropoid)

HOW DID YOU GET INTO FILMMAKING?

I got into filmmaking through photography. I became obsessed with photography from the age of 11. It was the idea that you could use the camera to create an image you might have in your head – like a technical pencil you could draw with. I would drive my parents crazy by setting fire to my action figures and photograph them burning. I’m inspired by many people and things, not just film makers. When I was younger I gravitated towards many films and filmmakers, because when you’re young, you’re still trying to figure out what you like and what you have to say and the way you would like to say it. It takes time to develop creatively as you need to have seen a little bit of the world, and know a little bit about what makes us tick. I think filmmakers start hitting their stride in their forties but obviously there are directors that blow this theory out of the water. Steven Spielberg was 28 when he made Jaws. I think Steven is the modern day film equivalent of Mozart. There are some directors that are just playing at a different level than everyone else, like a grand-master chess player. It’s like any other art-form; you have to work at it every day and get into that head-space that allows ideas to flow freely. The problem with the medium of film is that it’s so closely linked to the commercial aspects, both in making and in the end result. There are filmmakers that bridge these two worlds incredibly well and I find that inspiring.

cashback

DO YOU HAVE ANY FAVORITE FILMS, OR FILMS THAT CONTINUE TO INSPIRE YOU?

I have so many favorites! I’m still a filmmaker that loves watching films. I believe you have to see as much as possible to have an encyclopedic knowledge of the art-form that you work in. How can you comment if you don’t? People want to learn from people that know more than them, correct? So you better make something that does that, and that means you should be learning ALL the time about the process of filmmaking and life in general. For a number of years now I have written down all the films I have seen in a given year, so here is everything I have seen in 2016. I’ve only included Anthropoid once but I probably watched it 20 times at different screenings through 2016. An (R) indicates that I have seen the film before and it’s a re-watch.

January 2016

Anthropoid, We are Many (Doc), Suffragette, Carol, The Program, Woman in Gold, Infinitely Polar Bear, The Hateful Eight, He Named Me Malala (Doc), Joy, The Lobster, Ant-Man, Room, Timbuktu, Beasts of No Nation, Truth, Black Mass.

February 2016

Fear the Walking Dead – Season 1, Hard to be a God (2013), Macbeth (2015), Mad Men – Final season, Shackleton (2002), No Country for Old Men (R)

March 2016

Everest, La French (The Connection), Midnight Special, Son of Saul, Game of Thrones – Season 5, Listen to me Marlon (doc), Guardians of the Galaxy.

APRIL 2016

45 Years, The Endurance (2000 Doc), Singing in the Rain, The Artist (R), By the Sea, 2001 A Space Odyssey (R), Interstellar (R), Short Term 12

May 2016

Everything or Nothing (Doc), Palio (Doc), Big Hero Six (R), It’s a Beautiful Life, My Nazi Legacy (Doc), Bird (R), Brave (R), Bolshoi Babylon (Doc), Marshland, 99 Holmes.

June 2016

Suite Francaise, Southpaw, Crazy Heart (R), Hitchcock/Truffaut (Doc), Tracks, A War, The Past, Le Doulos, Closely Observed Trains, The Singing Detective (TV), Pennies from Heaven (TV), The Assassin.

July 2016

The Lure, Intimate Lighting (1965), Grandma, Demain (Doc), Populaire, How I Live Now, Lost in Munich, Tina – What’s Love Got to Do With It, Coal Miner’s Daughter, Ray, Beyond the Sea, De-Lovely, Great Balls of Fire, Walk the Line, Sweet Dreams, Tender Mercies, Theeb, Stop Loss, The Red Violin.

August 2016

The Night Of – Season 1, The Affair – Season 1

September 2016

Mr. Robot – Season 1, The Americans – Season 1

October 2016

Jane Got A Gun, Roma, Deadpool, Toni Erdman, Manchester by the Sea, Arrival, Hell or High Water, The Americans – Season 2, In the Shadow of the Moon (Doc), Fleabag – Season 1, The Stuntman, The Robber, Born to be Blue, Endurance (1999), Two for the Road, The Athlete, The Godfather (R), The Godfather part II (R), The Godfather part III (R), Personal Best, Prefontaine

November 2016

McFarland USA, Casablanca, My Way (Korean), Nocturnal Animals, The Walking Dead – Season 6, Running (1979), Saint Ralph, Embrace the Serpent, The Secret Life of Pets, Love, Amadeus (R), Wild (R), Dallas Buyers Club (R), Chariots of Fire (R), The Girl, Marnie (R), Harry and Son, Natalie (R), Sex and Lucia (R), Frida, The Boxer (R), Eyes Wide Shut (R), One More Time with Feeling, Hail, Caesar!

December 2016

The Omega Man (R), I Am Legend (R), La La Land, Assassin’s Creed, Under the Shadow, Silence (1971), Silence (2016), Rogue One, The Founder, Jackie, Hidden Figures, Shrek (R), Moonlight, Shrek 2 (R), Miss Sloan, Shrek the Third, Hacksaw Ridge, Zootropolis, Mustang, Eye in the Sky, Patterson, Fences, Train to Busan, Loving, The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner, This Sporting Life, 13th (Doc), Captain Fantastic, Eddie the Eagle, Sing Street, The Eagle Huntress (doc), Allied, Victoria, Evolution, My Scientology Movie, Deepwater Horizon, Julieta.

manila-1(still from Metro Manila)

DO YOU HAVE ANY FAVORITES OR DO YOU HAVE A TOP 10 LIST? I SUBSCRIBE TO THE IDEA OF “FAVORITES” BECAUSE I DON’T THINK IT’S POSSIBLE TO SAY WHAT IS TRULY “BEST” WITH ANY TYPE OF ART FORM.

Don’t ask me to rate my top 10 of the year. It’s like asking what are your favorite paintings from 1765? It has no relevance as only time will tell if a film has longevity, and I believe that’s the only merit there is – wanting to revisit a film 10 or 20 years from now. There are very few films I saw this year that I will revisit in 20 years. Some were just entertainment, and that’s fine. Some were fashionable footnotes and a few were highly over-praised and left me feeling underwhelmed. And there were a couple of small gems that made my life better for seeing them, but it’s all subjective and people place too much importance on what other people are saying about films. If you are serious about film then you have to discover it by yourself, by seeing everything without reading a review or seeing a trailer. There is one critic who uses the tagline “We see all the bad films, so you don’t have to…” You would have to be a pretty arrogant cunt to think you are saving people from films you think are bad, and that people would rather read your ‘bad’ review than have their own opinion. But that is the problem with smart phones – it gives people access to idiots like this, and it takes away the chance of discovering a film. When I was young, I used to pick my films based on the poster artwork alone – the same way most people choose a book – by its cover or the title and the synopsis on the back. If that’s not enough to make you want to see a film then maybe you don’t love film as much as you want people to think you do.

0179(Cillian Murphy and Anna Geislerová get ready to shoot a scene, Anthropoid)

WHAT SORT OF CHALLENGES COME WITH BEING YOUR OWN CINEMATOGRAPHER, NOT TO MENTION CAMEA OPERATOR, AND HOW HARD IS IT TO SHOOT IN THIS FASHION?

It’s all one job for me. I’m a filmmaker. I make them from the ground up. I come from photography so not having the camera in my hands feels unnatural to me. I work much faster with a camera in my hands as I can make any adjustments on the fly. If you have to stop and explain these adjustments it just takes a lot longer.  The last two films I have made have been handheld because I felt the style served the story. Both felt like they need to be in a documentary style to place the audience on the shoulders of the characters. So I would say they are the style of the film and not necessarily my style. It’s just a creative choice. To shoot in this style, I had to prepare for 4 months, with 2 hours of weight training every day. The cameras weigh about 18kg so all the training revolved around lifting, and carrying and running with that kind of weight. You have to be physically fit to run around with the camera on your shoulder for 9 hours a day, 6 days a weeks, and for 8 weeks without getting hurt or too tired to think creatively.

anth-fire(still from Anthropoid)

 

WOULD YOU EVER WANT TO COLLABORATE WITH AN OUTSIDE CINEMATOGRAPHER?

Absolutely! There are many fantastic cinematographers whose work I love. I know their work just as well as the directors they work with. A chance to work with one of the greats is never an opportunity that should be missed, as it will only deepen your experience and understanding of the craft.

0003(Jamie Dornan as Jan Kubiš, Anthropoid)

HOW DID METRO MANILA PREPARE YOU FOR ANTHROPOID?

I think it gave me back my confidence. The making of The Broken was not a pleasant experience for me but I did learn a lot about the sort of filmmaker I wanted to be. I made Metro Manila on my own terms with my own money. It was a huge gamble but the result was a film that I’m very proud of. You take that confidence into the making of your next film and hope it gets you through the day to day process.

manila-2(still from Metro Manila)

I WANT TO DISCUSS THE FINAL ACTION SEQUENCE IN ANTHROPOID. WHAT WAS IT LIKE PUTTING THAT TOGETHER ON A LOGISTICAL LVEL, AND DID YOU ACHIEVE WHAT YOU SET OUT TO ACCOMPLISH? IT’S A STUNNING PIECE OF UNRELENTING ACTION THAT RANKS UP THERE WITH SOME OF THE BEST SET-PIECES IN RECENT MEMORY.

Thank you. Logistically it was huge! I always knew it would be. You had to understand emotionally what those men went through, and the courage it took to face their last hours with such a defiant roar. That echo is still felt today in the Czech Republic. Shooting in the real church was not going to be logistically possible except for all the exteriors. The interior of the church was built on a soundstage at Barrandov studios and is a 1:1 replica of the real church made from the original plans. It took 13 weeks to build, as it was a 360 degree set with no green screen anywhere. Morgan Kennedy, my production designer, first built me a 1/6th scale church. I was able to light it and then crawl inside it. Using 12 inch action figures I photographed the sequence frame by frame. To dramatize the action I had the Gestapo reports, the autopsy reports, and the real church where you can still see where the grenades went off. Using all this I pieced together the events in storyboard form. We had a total of 6 days for the church interiors so they were pretty hard and long days. I’m happy with the sequence and I think we accomplished what we set out to achieve.

page_18(Action figure storyboard, Anthropoid. Courtesy of Sean Ellis)

 

WHAT WAS IT LIKE WORKING WITH CILLIAN MURPHY AND JAMIE DORNAN, AND IN GENERAL, WHAT’S YOUR PROCESS WITH ACTORS?

They were both great! Actors are marvelous creatures! I have no idea how they do what they do, so you have to treat each one differently and ask what they need in order for them to do their job. Cillian and Jamie worked in a similar manner so it was easy for me to slot in and give them what they needed in order to get what I needed. They both hate rehearsal. We would throw the scene ‘up on its feet’ in the morning when would entail walking through the scene, talking the lines but not acting the lines. Here we see any potential blocking issues, and any logic questions normally arise here as well. It was here that myself and Derek Walker, my second camera operator, would watch what the actors were doing and figure out how best to effectively cover the scene. Lines are often changed here too. I’m not precious – it has to work for the actor before it can work for me, but if I disagree, we shoot both ways and choose later. Once happy, I would light the set with my brilliant gaffer, Martin Granilla. I try to light without any lighting stands on the set, as I want the freedom of movement for both myself and my actors. When we are ready we shoot, I often do two or three takes within a slate. Stopping and starting can break concentration so I like to keep the actors working in the moment for as long as possible.

poid

 

THE BLENDING OF LOCATION SHOOTING AND SOUNDSTAGE WORK IN ANTHROPOID WAS REMARKABLE. WHAT WAS IT LIKE SHOOTING AT BARRANDOV STUDIO IN PRAGUE?

The studio was so good and has such history! We were on the same soundstage as Amadeus, Yentl, and Casino Royale, to name a few! But yes, mixing location shooting and studio shooting should be seamless and Morgan Kennedy and art director Radek Hanak did a fantastic job in bringing that altogether. I hate it when a set looks so obviously like a set, as it just pulls you out of the film!

anthrpoid

HOLLYWOOD HAS A LONG TRADITION WITH WWII FILMS. WERE YOU EXCITED TO TAKE ON A PROJECT OF THIS SCALE?

Yes, and scared too! You have to do your homework and see every war film that’s ever been made! There is a lot of preparation. I watched a lot of the BBC TV drama Secret Army and found it had the right tone for what I was looking for. But more than make a war film I really wanted to make a film about the emotional toll on the people involved. If you go into this film thinking it’s a war film you might miss the subtlety of the situations that these people found themselves in.

metro_manila_xlg

WHEN CONDUCTING RESEARCH AND TELLING A STORY THAT’S BASED ON TRUE EVENTS, HOW IMPORTANT IS IT TO YOU TO SICK TO THE FACTS? HOW MUCH ROOM DO YOU ALLOW FOR POETIC LICENSE?

I wanted to stick to the historical facts. I spent 10 years researching this story and spent months in the company of the people in charge of the Anthropoid archives. But there is always someone out there who loves to tell you that you got it wrong and they know more about it from their fourth year history lesson in school. I’m sure there will be someone out there saying “What does he know? He doesn’t even know that Josef is with a ‘Z’ as Jozef”. Well to answer that – he was born Jozef but later changed it to Josef and all the documents I have seen signed by him, were signed Josef. But obviously the main thing about Anthropoid is that there are different accounts based on different testaments. I presented the story knowing all the information and made certain informed guesses as to what testament to believe. The main dramatic license comes with relationships and dialogue. Jan and Josef did not shoot Nazi spies when landing in Czechoslovakia. They were greeted by a man who knew the resistance, but that’s a pretty boring start and also does not tell the audience that there were Nazi spies who were paid to inform on anti-Nazi activity. So this change helped to inform the story as well as opening the film with a set-piece. Also Jan and Josef were shagging everything in Prague! They both had at least three girlfriends each and moved around Prague staying with various different families and single mothers. But that doesn’t help their noble persona and it takes time away from developing the Mrs. Moravec character, played so brilliantly by Alena Mihulova. We also know that the seven men faced the 700 Germans with only hand guns and not Sten guns but this was a creative choice on my part. Also Jan Kubis was killed by a grenade blast and didn’t take his own life. But everything else was drawn from archive documents.

page_86(Action figure storyboard, Anthropoid. Courtesy of Sean Ellis)

HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THE CURRENT STATE OF FILMMAKING AND DISTRIBUTION MODELS? ARE YOU A FAN OF THE SAME-DAY VOD/THEATRICAL PLATFORM?

It’s a long answer and I’m not even sure I have the right answer. All I know is I’m unhappy with the current situation with cinemas. I’m even unhappier about this attitude that you can illegally download a film for free and that it’s okay. It’s not and it’s hurting the industry but people are no longer educated about this. The industry needs more help to protect the jobs that are lost to illegal downloads. There needs to be a cinema revolution the same way there was a coffee revolution. It’s starting to happen but slowly. I think studios should be allowed to take back the right to own their own cinemas. The monopoly rule is way out of date and the internet threatens the whole industry. For instance, Warner Brothers show a Warners Brother film and the only way to see it is in a Warner Brothers cinema. Force people back into theaters again with the experience of seeing something they can’t see elsewhere. And of the theatrical experience itself – BAN MOBILE FUCKING PHONES IN CINEMAS! One reason I don’t go to public cinemas anymore is the total lack of phone etiquette. People have to treat cinema like live theater. You wouldn’t take a call in the middle watching live theater so why do it in the cinema? I’ve seen people on their fucking laptops in the cinemas. Are you kidding me? Cinemas should just block phone signals to the auditoriums. Just force people to switch off. Cinemas are frightened people won’t come if there is no signal. News flash – people have stopped coming because there is signal. Cinemas use the excuse of needing signals in case of emergencies. That’s rubbish! What about before mobile phones were invented?

manila-3

WHAT DO YOU LOOK FOR WHEN SEARCHING FOR NEW MATERIAL? ARE YOU ATTRACTED TO PARTICULAR GENRES?

It’s the whole package really. The process is going to take two years of your life minimum so it helps if you really like the material and have a general interest. I can’t work any other way. I have to be obsessed about it, and I have to fall in love with it. But different people work in different ways.

0162(Director Sean Ellis explains the direction of fire to actor David Bredin, Anthropoid)

 

DO YOU THINK YOU COULD EVER BRING SOMETHING TO THE TABLE WITH A BIG FRANCHISE SUPERHERO MOVIE? ARE YOU INTERESTED IN THAT STUFF?

Again it depends. If I find something in that situation that I love then yes I would do it. But there seems to be this consensus among some filmmakers that Hollywood is the goal. You make an interesting film, it gets some heat, and then do a big budget studio film. You have to ask yourself why you are doing the studio film. And if the answer is to produce something entertaining with mass appeal that is really your vision, then you are in a great position. But many people take that route because it means access to a bigger budget. Bigger budget doesn’t mean a better film, and if the film then fails at the box office, where does it leave you? Most film makers have spent time in director’s jail at some point or another, and it’s a cold and lonely place.

manila-purple

 

WHAT’S YOUR NEXT PROJECT? DO YOU DEVELOP MORE THAN ONE FILM AT A TIME? CAN YOU TELL US WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS?

I’m adapting a novel so my day job currently consists of writing. I don’t like the process of writing but I like the fact that it is something that needs to be done every day and over a period of weeks, and you are rewarded by a pile of pages that one day, you hope, will become your film. I rarely work on more than one project at a time. I have various ideas percolating in my head at any given time but when the hard work needs to be done you have to be faithful to the idea you are working on and knuckle down to get it done. It’s a marathon, not a sprint.

ellis-banner

 

 

STEFANO SOLLIMA’S SUBURRA — A REVIEW BY NICK CLEMENT

2

Suburra is lethal cinema. Directed with vice-grip intensity by Stefano Sollima, this sprawling and propulsive crime film centers on modern organized crime in Italy and how it intersects with politics and the Vatican in present day Rome. Feeling like an unofficial sequel to Matteo Garrone’s Gomorrah, Suburra presents the audience with a slew of characters, almost all of whom are morally questionable and operating outside the lines of accepted society. The violence and sex are graphic and in your face, the cynical narrative is dense yet coherent, leaving no stone unturned or any of the various plot lines dangling, and the vivid and incredibly atmospheric cinematography by Paolo Carnera is frequently eye-scorching, with an extra-smart use of neon and nocturnal rain resulting in some elegant widescreen visuals. The tough as nails screenplay was adapted by Stefano Rulli, Sandro Petraglia, Carlo Bonini, and Giancarlo De Cataldo from the novel by Bonini and De Cataldo. There are unexpected twists and turns that this film takes, and all of it has an unpredictable charge that leaves you pumped for the next scene. Sollima has been hired to direct the sequel to Sicario; I never felt one was needed but now I’m very excited to see it. An Italian-French co-production, Suburra is currently streaming on Netflix (who also partially funded the project), and ranks as one of the best surprises in recent memory.

3

MIKE MILLS’ BEGINNERS — A REVIEW BY NICK CLEMENT

3

Released in 2010, Beginners is a sweet and sad little film in equal measure, with a generous and warmhearted script from director Mike Mills. Christopher Plummer was absolutely fantastic as an older man who suddenly announces that he’s gay, which brings him and his son, played by the always great Ewan McGregor, even closer together as a unit. There’s some great chemistry between McGregor and the gorgeous Melanie Laurent, who plays McGregor’s love interest, and who delights with some casual peek-a-boo nudity. Mills’ quirky directorial style, which smartly utilizes a flashback structure, punches up the film with some stylish pizzazz, while the ending contains some bittersweet notes of personal reflection that felt honest and rooted in the here and now. Kasper Tuxen’s shimmery cinematography creates a luxurious but never ostentatious visual mood, while the peppy but melancholic score from Roger Neill, Dave Palmer, and Brian Reitzell fit the story like a glove. There’s also some of the best dog acting I’ve ever seen; the reaction shots from the pooch are beyond adorable and smartly integrated into the playful narrative. Mills based the story off of his personal experiences when his father came out of the closet late in life.

1

GREGG ARAKI’S WHITE BIRD IN A BLIZZARD — A REVIEW BY NICK CLEMENT

3
White Bird in a Blizzard is something unique – a touching coming of age story, a tense and unpredictable whodunit with a dynamite final twist, a study of marital discord, and a time capsule back to the late 80’s, all of it filtered through some surrealistic touches and flights of fancy for good artistic measure. Directed with customary style by Gregg Araki (The Doom Generation, Smiley Face, Mysterious Skin) who also wrote the genre-defying screenplay based off of Laura Kasischke’s novel, White Bird in a Blizzard feels like one of those movies that’s just waiting to be discovered by a passionate cult audience. Shailene Woodley, so wonderful in The Spectacular Now and The Descendants, was fantastic in the lead role of Kat Connor, a sexually blossoming high-school student with a phenomenally messed up mother (a whacked-out Eva Green) and a put-upon father (a quiet Christopher Meloni) who is trying to figure out what kind of woman she’s growing up to be.
2
The narrative is framed around Kat meeting with her therapist (a kindly Angela Bassett), flashbacks to Kat’s colorful childhood, and the various romances that Kat embarks upon (the boy next door, an older police officer, a college romance). Woodley is naked here – physically and emotionally – and I absolutely love watching her as an actress. She’s able to express vulnerability very well, and she has an unforced and extremely natural presence about herself as an actress. Green steals all of her scenes as the Mom From Hell, and I loved how Arakki upended expectations in more than a few instances, and then threw a killer twist at the viewer during the final moments. The bold and color cinematography by Sandra Valde-Hansen is frequently mesmerizing. This dark and lyrical film was a big surprise, and hopefully it finds a large audience at home. It’s currently streaming on Netflix.
1

RICHARD LESTER’S ROBIN AND MARIAN — A REVIEW BY NICK CLEMENT

2

Robin and Marian is a ton of fun, directed with zest by Richard Lester (a favorite filmmaker of mine), and preformed with twinkle-in-the-eyes star-power by Sean Connery and Audrey Hepburn. Robert Shaw and Richard Harris were both fantastic (as always), and the rest of the deep supporting cast was ace down the line. How and why this film isn’t available on Blu-ray is beyond my level of comprehension; the cinematography by David Watkin is absolutely gorgeous and worthy of proper restoration. John Barry’s jaunty and romantic score perfectly sets the mood, while the final act hits some very emotional notes for the characters, with a pleasing sense of gentle melancholy hovering over the final moments. The chemistry between Connery and Hepburn was wonderful in this movie; they sell the idea of cinematic romance with serious conviction.  This was the first movie that I saw Connery in, as it’s one of my father’s favorite films, and I probably saw this with the family when I was eight or nine years old. Throughout the years, it’s been an easy choice to make in terms of a title worth revisiting, because it just puts a smile on my face.

1

GARRETT ZEVGETIS’ BEST AND MOST BEAUTIFUL THINGS — A REVIEW BY NICK CLEMENT

1

Best and Most Beautiful Things is a very intense documentary, on any number of levels, and is the type of film that will reduce some to tears while watching. It also has the capacity to make you laugh, smile, feel frustrated, and by the end, enlightened. It highlights the life of Michelle Smith, a 20 year old legally blind woman living with her mother in Maine, who also suffers from a form of autism. But these apparent setbacks aren’t enough to keep her from her fulfilling her dreams, and from finding someone special. It’s Smith’s dream to live a life that she feels is normal, comfortable, and happy, no matter how different it all may seem to others. Because director Garrett Zevgetis smartly kept such a fixed and forthright grip on his subject, and because Smith is such a lovely and positive-minded person, the potentially maudlin subject matter is given an honest ray of hope.

2

This is a unique coming of age story that will have the potential to move anyone who encounters it, a work that reminds us all that there’s a rebel inside of everyone, and how when faced with challenging odds, the human spirit is capable of glories that may not be so readily apparent. Inspiring and unexpectedly provocative, this is a piece of work that deserves to be seen, and it’s very cool to note that Kevin S. Bright, one of the producers of television juggernaut Friends, helped to get this film financed and produced. Films like this are important because they strive to show the human spirit and what people are capable of. Best and Most Beautiful Things was released in select cities last December, and is now available to stream via ITunes and is also available for purchase on DVD. The film will be added to Netflix on January 9th. http://apple.co/2hMG7xj

3

DON CHEADLE’S MILES AHEAD — A REVIEW BY NICK CLEMENT

3

Uninterested in being a straightforward biopic and all the more enjoyable because of that fact, Don Cheadle’s impressionistic and time-jumping portrait of iconic jazz artist Miles Davis, appropriately titled Miles Ahead (the title of his 1957 album), is a celebration of its subject while still presenting a warts and all narrative that focuses on the turbulent period in the 70’s when his career wasn’t in full swing as a result of drug addiction and other factors. Ewan McGregor appears as a journalist looking for the story of his life, and Emayatzy Corinealdi was excellent as one of Davis’ former back-up dancers who became his wife and muse. This was clearly a passion project for Cheadle, who collaborated with Steven Baigelman, Stephen J. Rivele, and Christopher Wilkinson on the fast and loose screenplay, and who directed with gusto, giving the film a startling pulse, and letting Davis’ propulsive rhythms, both as a musician and as a human being, take center stage.

2

His performance is smooth and rough all at once, befitting his subject, for whom he clearly feels a tremendous affinity for, as the film is both respectful and artistic, while showcasing some of Davis’ greatest songs from all throughout his legendary career. Shot with swagger and vivid color by cinematographer Roberto Schaefer (Monster’s Ball, Quantum of Solace) and edited with a mosaic quality by John Axelrad and Kayla Emter, there’s a great sense of style to the picture, while Hannah Beachler’s evocative production design would lead you to believe that the production cost more than its reported $345,000 budget. After premiering at the 2015 New York Film Festival, Miles Ahead saw theatrical release last October, grossing $5 million in a limited run. The film is now available on Blu-ray and as a streaming option on various providers. Fun fact: the IMDB lists 36 people in various producer capacities who are associated with this film.

1

JAMES PONSOLDT’S THE SPECTACULAR NOW — A REVIEW BY NICK CLEMENT

1

Teenage alcoholism is rarely handled so openly and honestly as it is in The Spectacular Now, which was director James Ponsoldt’s excellent third film, after his 2006 debut Off the Black (which I’ve not seen), and his striking 2012 sophomore effort, Smashed, which was another film to deal with out of control substance abuse. The sensitive screenplay by Scott Neustadter and Michael Weber, which was based on Tim Tharp’s novel, hit all the proper notes of sadness, romance, and believable interpersonal relationships, with the combo of Miles Teller and Shailene Woodley absolutely nailing their roles, and helping to create two people who we absolutely want to see succeed despite their inherent flaws, Teller in particular. This film really understands the high school experience, young love, and first sexual experiences, and contains moments of introspection that are at times startling in their unanticipated depth; credit the astute writing with never overplaying its hand at any moment.

2

The final scene and last few moments of this film land with complete perfection, asking the viewer to contemplate the future for its main characters in a way that feels satisfying and mysterious all at once. The themes explored in this film will be tough for some, and the lived-in quality that the filmmaking team established rooted the entire piece in a believable atmosphere; there could be aspects to this story that hit very close to home for some viewers. There’s a rather amazing supporting cast which includes Brie Larson, Kyle Chandler, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Kaitlyn Dever, and Bob Odenkirk, with everyone getting a scene or two to really deliver the goods. After making a splash at Sundance, this film got lost in the shuffle with a late summer release date in 2013, but is available on Blu-ray and various streaming providers, and feels like a film that’s just waiting to find a deserved cult following.

3

GAVIN HOOD’S EYE IN THE SKY — A MINI-REVIEW BY NICK CLEMENT

1

Gavin Hood’s sharp and unsettling political thriller, Eye in the Sky, details the heavy costs of drone warfare, presenting the viewer with a believable scenario, and never backing down from the reality of the story being presented. The diverse and eclectic cast includes a steely Helen Mirren, the superb as always Alan Rickman (so sad he’s gone), Aaron Paul, Barkhad Abdi, Jeremy Northam, Iain Glen, and Phoebe Fox, with everyone doing strong, un-showy, ground level work. Guy Hibbert’s swift screenplay wastes not a moment, getting right to business, and hardly letting up during the tight 90 minutes of action.

2

The slick lensing by Haris Zambarloukos is a further production bonus; this is a really photogenic movie without ever being in-your-face flashy. As with Hood’s extremely underrated 2007 topical thriller Rendition, he has a tendency to not go full-on over the top with his plotting, instead allowing for rational decisions to rule the day, no matter how cynical or upsetting the outcomes might be. The final moments sting with a Fuck The Man sentiment that would make a filmmaker like Robert Aldrich smile; Hood gets visually self-righteous and for just cause, as he knows his message is an important one.

3