GAVIN O’CONNOR’S THE ACCOUNTANT — A REVIEW BY NICK CLEMENT

3
The Accountant is exactly the sort of movie that has been in short supply of late — an old school, high concept, totally slick star vehicle with a ridiculous yet extremely entertaining plot that’s just as fun as it is far-fetched. The spec script market seems to be dead, with nearly every film based on a book or a comic or a pre-existing property or some sort of remake or reboot. And while The Accountant isn’t going to win any awards, it puts forward an extremely engaging mix of genres in an effort to do something unique with strands of familiar plotting. The Accountant is true MOVIE, and I mean that in the best sense possible; I have really missed these types of films that aren’t necessarily designed to win Oscars or sell lunch boxes, but that have been crafted to entertain in that classic fashion that we used to expect. This film feels like a late 90’s studio offering, and I really hope that it does well at the box office so that more original ideas like this can make their way through the system. Stylishly directed by Gavin O’Connor (Warrior, Miracle, this year’s underrated western Jane Got A Gun) and densely conceived by screenwriter Bill Dubuque (The Judge), the film stars a perfectly cast Ben Affleck as an Aspergers-afflicted man with a penchant for numbers crunching and trigger pulling; by day he’s a buttoned up money manager who knows all of the tricks of the trade, and by night he’s a lethal assassin working for the highest bidder and taking out some extremely dangerous targets. It’s a melding of two different ideas, and then spiced up even further with no more than three subplots with some terrific supporting actors getting a chance to let it rip with juicy movie-star material. There’s a lot going on in The Accountant, and it takes its time telling its story; this isn’t exactly the slam-bang action flick that the trailers have sold, as it’s just as interested in its characters, especially Affleck, as it is in showcasing Silat-infused fight sequences and bloody shoot-outs.
2
Shot with casual style in desaturated, shadowy tones on 35 mm film by the great cinematographer Seamus McGarvey (World Trade Center, We Need to Talk About Kevin, The Avengers) and smoothly edited by Richard Pearson (United 93, Quantum of Solace), the film benefits from its low-key and rather moody musical score by the superb composter Mark Isham (O’Connor’s cop flick Pride and Glory, Wayne Kramer’s gonzo actioner Running Scared), and the sleek minimalist production design courtesy of Keith Cunningham and his art team. The high-powered fire-arms on display are rather awesome in their brute force, and I don’t remember an actioner with this many silencers in recent memory. O’Connor and Dubuque never use the Autism angle as a cheap ploy for sentimentality, and while the entire film certainly strains logic in more than once instance, the commitment from everyone in the deep cast and behind the camera sells the goods for this sort of strange and very atypical studio offering. Anna Kendrick is her usual chipmunk-adorable self, getting some great and unexpected laughs (this film is rather funny in retrospect) and developing a nice chemistry with Affleck, who for his part, never wavered in his dedication to a very mysterious character who only gradually allows the audience into his world of layered pain. The flashback sequences are some of the most interesting moments in the entire film, as in those parts, there’s almost this ethereal superhero quality that the film takes on; it’s hard to describe. Jon Bernthal is absolutely terrific in a spirited supporting performance as a rival assassin who is tasked with finding Affleck, and J.K. Simmons, Jeffrey Tambor, Jon Lithgow, and the alluring Cynthia Addai-Robinson all deliver very solid turns. And by the end, while The Accountant might not have broken any new ground, it reminds that a well-oiled programmer with a lack of huge special effects or year-end-award aspirations can be a very enjoyable alternative to the more overblown offerings that have come to dominate the cinematic landscape.
1

Peter Berg’s Deepwater Horizon: A Review by Nate Hill 

Peter Berg’s Deepwater Horizon floored me. Combining stirring heroics, meticulous procedural reconstruction, thundering big style special effects and a rock steady, salt of the earth cast who fire on all cylinders, Berg and team have successfully sent one of, if not the best films this year down the pipe (oily pun intended). The 2010 disaster aboard the mammoth Deepwater Horizon oil rig was a tragic, foolish and achingly avoidable event that was the product of carelessness, stupidity and resulted in the unnecessary death of eleven souls. Berg clearly weeps for the loss, and every frame of his film is filled with empathy and compassion, a reluctant condemnation of the Big Oil company men whose actions led to life lost, a rock jawed testamenr to the blue collar heroes who gave shot rays of hope through the darkest day with their brave deeds, and a celebration of the rip roaring set pieces possible in telling this story. Mark Whalberg has never, ever been better, playing the engineering honcho of te Deepwater, madly in love with his wife (Kate Hudson) and daughter (Stella Allen) The early scenes build their relationship with near effortless interactions and a thoughtful, compassionate eye. From the minute his chopper touches down on the rig and it becomes clear that safety protocol has been grossly neglected, he is a bundle of nerves and fears for every life on board above his own. Kurt Russell is right alongside him as a dogged senior operative with a short rope and no time for the headstrong, greedy and unprofessional actions of Big Oil honcho John Malkovich, giving his best, and insipid work in years as a guy who plainly and simply doesn’t care, putting everyone in harm’s way in the process. The best and most surprising performance of the film comes from Gina Rodriguez though, an actress who has mostly swam under my radar up until this point. Playing another senior engineer, her raw terror and naked uncertainty in the face of looming calamity and possible death is rough to watch, uterly convincing and made me want to just give her a big hug. If her work here is any indication of where she’s headed, make way folks, because we’re in for great things. The cast also extends into terrific further work from Ethan Suplee, J.D. Evermore, James Dumont, Dylan O Brien, Berg himself in a quick cameo, and many more. 2010Berg wisely wraps the story up not with one final action sequence, but with a hair raising emotional gut punch that tallies the loss of life and psychological damage of such an event with the care required. There is one final action beat to then story,  but it’s swift, necessary and sensible, never feeling overblown. The story is kept wisely focused on the people trapped aboard this explosion waiting to happen, their struggles and efforts in the forefront. When the fireworks do show up, they’re not to shock and awe the audience, or for cheap thrills, they serve only to illustrate such an event in a minimal fashion, which is still a deafening roar. My kind of disaster/procedural story, and one of the best so far this year.

GORE VERBINSKI’S THE RING — A REVIEW BY NICK CLEMENT

3I can still vividly remember seeing Gore Verbinski’s extra-sketchy horror thriller The Ring at a test screening deep in the San Fernando Valley, roughly five months before the film’s official release, and how absolutely floored the audience was by the conclusion, and on a personal level, how totally unnerved I felt when I left the theater and headed to the parking lot. I had not seen the original film, I had no real idea of the notion of “J-horror,” and because this genre is the one that’s the least traveled for me as a viewer, I wasn’t prepared for how lethal and odd this movie would be. I am a massive fan of Gore Verbinski’s work, from the smaller films (The Weather Man) to the blockbusters (The Lone Ranger, Pirates 1-3) to the outright surreal (Rango) and everything else in between (Mousehunt, The Mexican); he’s got a tremendous visual eye, he’s attracted to smart and quirky material, and I love his attention to detail and his sense of cinematic excitement.

2

The Ring is one of those movies that no matter how many times I check it out, I am always left creeped out by the finale; when that girl pops out of the television, I’m telling you, people leapt out of their seats during that advance screening and I needed a change of pants. Bojan Bazelli’s extraordinarily stylish images basically put you into a trance while watching this bold and artistic piece, and in tandem with the haunting musical notes from Hans Zimmer, the film conjured up a near constant state of dread while keeping unnecessary blood and gore to a minimum. And then there’s the scared-to-death face in the opening reel! Naomi Watts was great here, and looked utterly stunning, while weirdo-boy David Dorfman conveyed an appropriate amount of vulnerability and unease. Brian Cox comes in like thunder towards the end and dominates with a beyond menacing and pivotal supporting performance. Everything about this movie works for me as a viewer, and I find it to be thoroughly entertaining and rather glorious on an aesthetic level.

1

The stuff that dreams are made of: Remembering Explorers with Eric Luke by Kent Hill

 

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

When you were a kid, did you ever play pretend? Did you ever tie your Mother’s red table cloth around your neck and make-believe you were the Man of Steel. Or maybe with an arsenal of plastic pistols and a gang of friends image yourself in the heat of battle? Did you ever crawl inside a cardboard box and take off into the stars?

Eric Luke sat down at is desk one night many years ago and began musing on just that very notion. The only difference being, what if the cardboard box was a real spacecraft, which would propel you above the stratosphere and into the depths of space? What adventures would await you?

The film that would emerge from this glorious concept was Explorers; starring Ethan Hawke, River Phoenix, that guy Dick Miller, Robert Picardo and James Cromwell among others. It would be directed by Joe Dante; the man behind Gremlins, The ‘Burbs, Innerspace and Small Soldiers. He would lead a team of marvellous creative talents and craft a beloved film which has, at long last, garnered the appreciation it richly deserves, and along the way see itself elevated to a true classic.

It is a film that I hold dear and it (now it can be told) was also my first encounter with the concept of video piracy. But should the authorities read this, it was my Uncle Gary that did it, not me.

I have watched it often throughout the years and it still speaks to me. Ben, played by a young Ethan Hawke, was very much like I was at that age; a kid who loves dreaming and stories of the fantastic, and movies, staying up all hours and watching movies. Each time I revisit this picture I feel myself transported. I am back in my old room, movie posters all over the walls, the old set with the top-loading VCR situated above it and the joy, the wonder of watching dreams come alive on the screen.

I first contacted Eric when I asked him if he would be interested in writing a foreword for my friend Kevin Candela’s book Weedeaters. Turned out Eric is a huge fan of Day of the Triffids, so it was a great fit. Kevin confessed that he had not seen Explorers so I urged him to check it out. If you, dear reader have not seen it yet, then you might want to abstain from reading the following, as spoilers abound. If you have seen it then please kick back, relax and read the story of the man who took his childhood imaginings and shared them with the world.

 

 

KH: Explorers was one of the high water mark films of my formative years, and I figured who better to talk to about than the gentleman who wrote it?

EL: That’s great, that’s great. It’s always nice – I mean, it’s been such a long time and it was the sort of experience where it was released and it didn’t do very well, in fact it did horribly initially and I thought, well that’s that, it was a nice pipe dream and it really paid the bills in a nice way while it happened but that time is over and, you know, I happy that it happened, but, you know good bye. Well over the years, it’s come back again and again, I’ll be talking to somebody, and it’s people of a certain age who I think were still watching VHS tapes, you know, because it was released on VHS and could, so the idea was they could watch the tapes over and over and over, and sort of get to know the movie a little bit better than they would nowadays where you stream it once and go on to the next thing.

KH: Well certainly for my age group, and I only ever saw the film on VHS, I did not see it at the cinema…

EL: Right, not many people did by the way.

KH: (laughter) Like a lot of these movies it seems to be the trend. They come and don’t meet expectations as far as the studios are concerned…

EL: Well back then was the beginning of this trend, if it didn’t do well in the opening weekend, they did not give it time to catch on, and especially back then, there was no secondary market. It was not going to Netflix, there was no Netflix, there was online market. It would basically disappear unless they gave it a release on VHS and then you could go rent it at a store. Now, it did so poorly, the initial weekend, that they said Oh we’re not going to release it on VHS, then a short time later they said, well let’s give this a try, and it did moderately well, but it was always called a cult hit. But, you know, never was considered any kind of financial hit at all.

KH: But it has gone on because I believe it has a lot of enduring qualities about it. There are so few films that have some of the ingredients which Explorers has. It has a wonderful cast, it has a wonderful message – it’s a film with something to say. There used to be this crossroads in the arts were it wasn’t always the singular direction of how much can we sell, it used to be also: what do we have to say?

EL: The thing that sold it, because I was working I a science fiction bookstore, I had graduated from UCLA film department, and had written a couple of scripts and nothing took off, but the thing that sold it, that Paramount thought, let’s make this was like the one sentence concept, because E.T. had just come out and been the biggest hit ever, so my answer to that was three boys build their own space and go into space and it all works, it’s not just a fantasy, there’s some scientific underpinning. It was beginning to be the era where it was the concept of the film that was selling it rather than character. So I have to say that that one sentence is what sold it, but then having the characters to back it up and the emotion and all the stuff that needs to be there for a good story I think is what has made it last. But they were really open to high concept movies in a big way and I think it’s been the same ever since. It’s, you know, sort of stayed that way for a long time.

KH: So were you were always interested in movies and making movies?

EL: Yes, ever since I was a kid, I picked up the home movie camera and started making movies as early as elementary school and just kept at it all the way through, through high school and then went to UCLA for college to learn how to do that. But, you know, I didn’t grow up in Los Angeles, I had no concept of how to try and be successful and get into the film industry. It was a big mystery. So to have this script was my ticket in, and I think I chanced on the right idea at the right time, but, you know, I was basically working, I was going to a film editor at this small special effects house and I had no idea what the future looked like. Then, one night, this idea came to me. It was actually back from when I was a kid and we used to actually pretend we had our own spaceship, so I went back and played let’s pretend again and that’s how the whole thing happened. That’s how it worked.

KH: Ok, so you sit down and write the script – where did you go from there – did you go through the regular channels or did you manage to get it somebody who was interested?

EL: Yeah, I got out of UCLA with a short film and just took it to all the studios and you know, the big story at the time was that Spielberg had crawled over the back fence at Universal and set up an office and put up a name plate on an office door and pretended like (laughter) he was part of the film department, and nobody questioned it, and, you know, that’s how he got his career going. So I knew you had to be fearless, so I just cold called from the outside and said I have this, would you like to look at it and got an agent through that, and then they actually passed on it and said we think this script is sellable, or marketable, then one of those agents broke off and formed her own agency and said I think I can do something with this. So it was like a series of dominoes falling over, and she submitted it over a weekend read, everybody passed on it except for the last guy who said, I like this a lot. He took it around, all the studios passed on it except for Paramount at the very end who said we like this, we think we can do something with it. I developed it with them and they showed it to all kinds of directors, everybody passed on it and one of the last directors was Joe Dante, who said, I love this, who do I talk to about it this? So it was a series of steps right to the cliff edge where I though, that was it, it was a nice career while it lasted, but nothing ever happened, and at the very end it actually did go into production.

KH: So is the film that we have seen, is it true to your script or was it drastically altered?

EL: It was altered a lot; it was my first big experience with the studio development process. And my third act, once they go to outer space was always more of a boy’s adventure movie and there was more at stake, there were more bad aliens and good aliens and the kids are caught in the middle and they were trying to get a crystal that had all the secrets of Martian civilisation, so it really felt like boy’s adventure or something like that. And then Joe Dante came in and his whole thing is pulling out the rug under people’s expectations and he, I think in response to the feeling like everybody going to expect them to have this Spielbergian cosmic experience in space, wanted to say no, actually the big reveal is they are kids like you – and they watch TV, they watch monster just like you, they love science fiction just like you. So that was his big twist, so that third act never felt like mine but I certainly worked with Joe to try and work with that concept, and make it the best it could be. But it really did change from my first draft.

KH: So worked more with Joe on the script than the producers or equally with both?

EL: It was a long process. I initially worked with the producers and the studio, developing it in order to get it to Joe Dante and then Joe said, because he had just had Gremlins, again one of the most successful movies ever, so he was the 800 pound gorilla who could say no, I want to develop it my way, and the studio backed off, so suddenly I was working with Joe and his team. So I got a real education about what the development process is like and who has the creative power to finally put their foot down and say this is mine now and this is my vision.

KH: So was that a better experience, working with the director who is going to bring about the films conception as opposed to a bunch of story people who are essentially trying to make your story fit into a mould?

EL: Absolutely, because it was all art by committee and it felt like people, you know, giving me creative notes based on marketing, or based on some concept that I had no idea why, I didn’t understand it, but at that point I was saying O boy anything, just tell me what to do. There’s a feeling, you know, because you sell the script and you are working on it by virtue of them saying yes, we want you to be here, but we just as easily give it to somebody else so, me being really young thought, I’ll work with these people, I definitely want to be involved in this, I still feel owner even though its changing. So to work with Joe was a relief. He’s a great guy; he included me in the entire process, where I said I actually want to stay on this through production and through post-production, and he said absolutely, so it was like the best film school in the world for me, you know, apprenticing myself to him. So he was great.

KH: You were there, hanging out on the set?

EL: Constantly. I went with Joe up to ILM, I sat through the sound mix, you know, all the way up to the release, I was just really sort of shadowing Joe, and have nothing but good memories. I was really a great time, a very exciting time.

KH: Well it really was a double whammy for you, I mean; you sell your first script, you get to be present at your first production. You hear so many stories where the writer sells the script but the movie is never made. You not only sell your script, but are gifted the full ride?

EL: Oh yeah, and so many scripts get taken away from people, and you just sort of wave good bye to it, and it turns up later in the theatre and you don’t recognise it. Explorers I was on all the way, through the production – cause there was these huge stages over at Paramount, like that whole set, you know, the creek, where they build the spaceship, a life creek that they build in the back of this stage…

KH: The creek bed was a set?

EL: Right, right. I think there were a few helicopter fly-over shots, aerial shots where they have establishing day time shots of the real neighbourhood, but the rest was shot on a sound stage. It was really odd for me because I based that on a creek behind my house when I was a kid, and here it was recreated in Hollywood on a great big sound stage, and it was so real that I remember one day the first AD said: “I have to make an announcement, we want the grips to stop urinating in the underbrush.” (laughter) Because it was so real, I guess they just lost track of that, but it was horrible (laughter).

KH: Well that is incredible; so a good portion of the film was sound stage shot. Obliviously locations were used for exteriors?

EL: Yes that is pretty obvious those are real exteriors, but so much of it, day time and night time had to be shot on that sound stage that they said, let’s just build it, it gives us much more control, and there is so much that has to happen there, from building the spaceship – it just makes much more sense that way.

KH: Right and you don’t have to fight the weather?

EL: Exactly. And also they were kids, you know, they can only work with them so many hours per day, they were all fourteen, so there was all this scheduling stuff with them. And then of course the whole ending, the interior of that spaceship was on a huge stage too. It doesn’t look that big on the finished film, but when you walked onto that set it was pretty amazing.

KH: I can image. Where they land on the alien craft, it appears to be quite a cavernous space, also the moon lounge, if you will, where they sit and watch TV?

EL: It was pretty clever as far as multi-purposing the different sections, cause the whole interior of the spaceship had that look. I remember Joe walking in and saying this feels like 5000 fingers of Dr. T, if you’ve seen the old Dr. Seuss film?

KH: I have.

EL: He said it feels like that, hopefully that’s not a bad omen because that film did so badly (laughter). But the look of that, with those oddly reflective, dully reflective surface and those colours – anyway, great memories.

KH: Wonderful – that was something I was unaware of, that the creek was a stage – fantastic. No I think it’s a great picture, more specifically I love the three boys, cause I think they represent a good cross-section of people in the world, you’ve got the dreamers, the sceptics, and the scientific or logical minds – it is a great balance that carries us through this fantastic tale – and like you’ve mentioned in your conception of the script, who didn’t, when they were little sit behind the wheel of the family car and pretend they were driving, or turn a cardboards box into and rocket ship. Another part I love, watching the climax where they were all flying above the clouds, coming off watching Superman, and wondering how marvellous it would be to soar through the air. Flying on to more expansive dreams and certainly other adventures?

EL: Yeah, and that’s what I thought at the end, that left it open. I was going to say that, it was essential for me when I was a kid, I loved science fiction and part of that, my father was a scientist at NASA for a first moon shots, and all of that excitement for John Glenn and then for the first moon landing, my father was part of the NASA, he was a computer programmer and so for me growing up it was always this feeling that the science had to be working also. So, you know, you can write a screenplay where anything can happen and it’s a fantasy, but the underpinnings of, hey, maybe this really could work, and back then computers were really just starting to be this thing, where if you had a feeling like if you could program in these pre-internet days, if you could find the right circuit board, or the right program – computers were the new magic, and they hadn’t come into their own the way they have nowadays and there wasn’t any social media, there weren’t apps that you could download every day, every second of the day – it was really basic computers and computer graphics and really simple straight forward programming language but, it was just the beginning of that where it did feel like the new magic, and that you could fly, or that you could create force fields, you could do whatever you wanted to do if you just knew the right program.

KH: You must have been influenced by the science fiction films from the 50’s, and there seems to be a lot of references in Explorers to Joseph Newman’s This Island Earth, which I had seen prior to watching Explorers, and indeed Ethan Hawke is watching that film within the film. The idea I noticed that was similar was human’s being brought together to work on alien technology?

EL: Yeah, and there is also the idea at the beginning that they are given the special message, the thing to build, which will allow them to communicate with outer space, the magic crystal in effect, the alien technology that will then expand the world and allow them the explore outer space.

KH: Like you have mentioned, you had a privileged entrance into the business in working with Joe Dante, who has a marvellous career. He had just come off of Gremlins – had you seen that film and where you aware of him before your collaboration began?

EL: Yeah, in fact that was one of the nights of my life, because they said, oh there’s this new movie Gremlins and the director of it is interested in Explorers. There’s a screening of it tonight at, it was called the Mann’s Chinese Theatre but it used to be Grauman’s Chinese Theatre in Hollywood, and Joe is gonna be there. So I went and I watch Gremlins sitting behind Joe Dante, and we hadn’t met yet, but I knew that that was him. And the crowd was going nuts, they loved it, and I just thought oh god, if this guy says yes to this script, this is fantastic. So it was really memorable.

KH: I started to mention the cast before, a great young cast; a young Ethan Hawke, a young River Phoenix. It wouldn’t be a Joe Dante movie without Dick Miller or Robert Picardo.

EL: Exactly, exactly.

KH: I guess the element that brought me into the film is that I identified with the character of Ben because that’s how I was as a kid, always like, why can’t we just go off in the spaceship, and Wolfgang’s like, no we need to run tests, and Darren’s like who cares, in the beginning that is?

EL: And also we gave Darren the mechanical aptitude to assemble the whole thing, and work with tools and the unhappy home life, you just get a little hint that that’s going on, so within himself he’s looking for a reason to escape.

KH: I loved the whole christening of the ship with his Dad’s beer, I christen thee, the Thunder Road from the Springsteen song, cause the other guys are trying to come up with something grander and arguably pretentious with the Jules Vern or the Einstein?

EL: That’s another great memory. They said we don’t think we are going to able to get the rights to call it the Thunder Road. So I said, can I write a personal letter to Bruce Springsteen cause that’s one the anthems of my youth. So I wrote a really heartfelt letter to him about, you know, as I was growing up I used to just drive all night and play that on the car stereo, so it was just like it is supposed to be, and it really speaks to me, and he wrote back and said ok, use it. So that was another great moment.

KH: I don’t know if it was your intention, but is the Starkiller reference a nod to the fact that in the original Stars Wars story Luke Skywalker was originally named Luke Starkiller?

EL: Yep. I had read an early script of Star Wars that somebody slipped me called like the Starkiller Chronicles or something like that, or Chronicles of some alien name that was really awkward, but that was definitely from that, so I thought, I’ll use that (laughter).

KH: I would have really have loved to have seen more of the Starkiller movie that is going on in the drive-in scene…

EL: Me too!

KH: Was that – that was obviously a separate little production?

EL: Yeah they built that over on another stage, and I have to say that that was the day that Joe was obviously having the most fun.

KH: It must have been like a flashback to his Corman days?

EL: Yes, yes exactly, and, you know, he was dealing with the studio, and all of this – some tension every day, but that particular day he just had a blast. You could see him just open up and go, oh, this is what I love! (laughter)

KH: I loved how it appeared to be dubbed badly?

EL: It was supposed to be an Italian production that had been poorly dubbed into English.

KH: I love how Ben was the one that had seen the film already and the boys are discussing it and Darren says does she take her clothes off, referring to the girl in the movie, and Ben says yeah, she has three navels…

EL: (laughter)

KH: Another part, the part played by Dick Miller I have always wanted to know or have confirmed, when he is on the phone to his buddy and says, I’ve been having dreams and I haven’t had dreams like this since I was a kid – is he or has he had the same dream that the boys are having?

EL: Yeah, that was the idea. Joe would come to me at the end of every day and say, here are the scenes for tomorrow, can we get something more, and we would sort of work day to day, which I was surprised at because the studio would try and lock the script and say, no more changes, and here was Joe improvising with the kids and coming up greats ideas and little moments – and with the Dick Miller character, he said I need something more from him, you know, he was initially just a threat that they would be discovered and somehow stop them from going to space, there needed to be that threat for them to overcome. And so, through discussion with Joe, he said what if he remembers, and through him remembering his own childhood it’s the same dream. It’s not a big plot point, but it’s there if you notice it.

KH: I admit I was always curious, particularly when he says I haven’t had these kind of dreams since I was a kid. Then at the end of the film, because all the kids are having the collective dream, then Ben’s love interest wakes up near the end like she too has experienced the dream and is then flying with him and the others in the dream preceding the credits?

EL: Definitely. All of that is true.

KH: Great. That’s been bugging me for a while now, and I thought if I ever get to talk with someone connected to the movie, that is something I want to know.

EL: You know, so much of what just falls apart in movies is that everything is spelt out, there is no mystery, no question marks, you know, you need – the studio thinks that you not only need to tell everybody, but you need to tell them twice or three times because they are underestimating the intelligence of the audience or even of kids to involve and ask questions and sort of leave something mysterious. So that was the idea there, was to make it more interesting by never stating it.

KH: I have always loved it because it was subtle. In another scene, when they take off for the stars finally, Dick Miller is watching them, and the way he is watching them, and he says, nice going kid. It is almost like he doesn’t want to stop them really – he only wants a kind of verification that the dreams he has been having, have substance and…

EL: …Are real, and that this kid is going to get to go and do something he never got to do himself.

KH: It’s wonderful, and I think it is something that is missing from films today. It’s like you said, they are so good at crossing all the t’s and dotting all the i’s and there’s nothing to ponder at the end?

EL: I mean, you see smaller independent films where there are lots of things that a mysterious, and poetic and left up to your interpretation. But big studio films are seldom like that because they have to play it so safe – for sure.

And by the way, it strikes me, it’s really great to talk about all these story points after all these years.

KH: Oh this is a gift for me sir. I was different from all of my friends in that I watched films more intently, the first time was for enjoyment but after that I would go back again and really pick it to pieces. I was and am very much a student of movies aside from watching them for enjoyment.

EL: And I was the same way. I watched film, I mean, back then you couldn’t – films were not on demand. You had to wait for them to come to the local theatre, or film festivals or maybe they would be on TV and maybe you’d get to see it a second time, but never a third time. So it was really odd to be on the other side, to actually be making the movie and seeing, you know, each one of these moments is going on screen and, are people ever going to watch it at all or more than once. It’s great, and thank you for doing this, it’s great to talk about it again.

KH: It’s my pleasure. Can you tell me what that feels like, I mean, you’re sitting there with this script you’ve written, you’ve obviously thought about it a long time, you’ve put it down on paper, you hope that it would get made and now you are sitting there on the set watching it come alive – that’s gotta be an indescribable experience?

EL: Initially it just feels like a rollercoaster that’s going too fast, because the writing process is all really, the timeline of the writing is up to you. You get to consider every word and do it in silence, and it’s very solitary – then, all of a sudden there are 30 to 40 to 50 people all waiting for the thing to be done and to move on to the next thing, and you’re looking at performance, there are all kinds of people: actors being the foremost, but then the people interpreting what you’re thinking, and if it doesn’t feel right to you, and you say to yourself okay wait a minute, with did that feel right and actually what can I say to change it that people will understand – and all of sudden, it’s onto the next shot, and onto the next moment. So that was one thing I had to get used to was the pace, was unbelievable compared to actually sitting down and writing it, but then there are moments were you go, that was exactly how I imaged it in my head and somehow it all came together.

KH: So did you do a lot of rewriting during filming?

EL: On a daily basis. Like I said, Joe would come to me, and have ongoing discussions, because again, I said, can I be involved in this whole thing, and he said absolutely, I would love to have a writer on the set every day, because then we can talk about how we can make these little changes. So, I remember even coming up to him during the shot, or saying, because they were going to do a second take, and I said, how ‘bout this, how about giving them this, and he was completely open to that which any other director might have said shut up, you’re bothering me, but Joe was really open to that.

KH: I’ll tell you, another thing I’ve always wanted to know, is the line yours or was it improvised, the line about Lassie – when the alien says I watched four episodes of Lassie before I realized why the little hairy kid never spoke?

EL: (laughter) Arh, that was actually Robert Picardo, and Joe really liked to work with him because he improvises, and I’ll tell you, they put him in that make-up, and turned on the camera and let him go, and he was coming out with one-liners that had everyone on the floor. So they just let him go and edited together the ones they thought were best, including the Lassie line.

KH: That is still one of my favourite lines: why the little hairy kid never spoke, I mean sure he rolled over fine, but I don’t think he deserved a serious for that.

EL: (laughter)

KH: So Rob Bottin also worked on the film, doing creature effects?

EL: Yes, yes, in fact the look of the creatures which, of course Joe loves Warner Bros. cartoons, and that whole design thing that comes out of Chuck Jones, and there’s always references to Chuck Jones, I mean, I don’t know, Joe when he was a kid just watched Warner Bros. cartoons all the time and loves that aesthetic and the timing and all of that stuff, so he was able to bring all of that with him and Rob Bottin, you know, there was all these designs which were very realistic, cause again, E.T. had just come out, and this film being a response to E.T., and a lot of the initial designs were very realistic – then, all of a sudden, all these cartoony designs came in and Joe said, that’s perfect, look at theses, you know, that’s what these aliens are going to like – and I went with it. I mean I look at them and said ok, I’m trusting in Joe, because this is his film now and that’s how it happened. I think Rob brought in those designs for the aliens.

KH: He having worked with Joe on The Howling and he did The Thing and so many others.

EL: That whole idea of change make-up and rubber make-up and transformation make-up is really a lost art now because digital effects can do anything, and you can’t see the effect coming, whereas back then, the shot would start and there’d be something a little odd about it and then you’d say ok, this is great what’s gonna happen? So you would sort of prepare and see what the make-up artist could come up with because it was physical, it was right there in front of you, and it’s like looking at a puppet master or that kind of craft as opposed to a digital artist working, but behind the scenes.

KH: It have made it easier in a sense, because as you say, it’s right there for the boys to interact with – his ears, his antennas, was the mouth operated by a puppeteer?

EL: No that was Picardo’s mouth. That was one of the few things that he could control aside from the arms and fingers and the body language. There was a team of maybe eight technicians surrounding him with bicycle cables that were controlling the eyes, the antennas, the nose, I mean, everything about him and all he had was the mouth so that’s what he started to do, tell jokes constantly.

KH: Could he see?

EL: No he couldn’t see. They had to lead him onto the set, cause he was blind, and then set him up and let him do his thing.

KH: So, if we may talk briefly about it, after Explorers did you go on and try to get other movies developed?

EL: Yeah, one great thing that happened is I got put on contract at Paramount, which they were still doing at the time, it’s unheard of now, but they actually had a few writers on contract that they would have work on different – like, make this script funnier, or we’ve got this project we want to develop in this direction, so can you develop it, and for me, I got lots of experience writing screenplays and unfortunately, responding to studio notes about how to change scripts, rather than taking a step back and saying I want do a deeply personal project the way that Explorers was. So it really paid the bills, and for the rest of my life I’m really happy I had that time, in fact I followed the regime over to Disney. When Michael Eisner and Jeffrey Katzenberg moved from Paramount to Disney, they took me along and put me on contract over at Disney and one thing I got to do was write and direct for Disney Television. There were a couple of movies called Not Quite Human, about a robot boy who wanted to be a real boy – and at the time they were really successful, you know I got to do the sequel also, because it was successful for Disney TV. But it didn’t lead anywhere. I got to develop scripts or pitch scripts, and some got picked up at MGM and at a few other places, and then eventually – I think because I kinda reached the end of my creative, whatever it was that drove me in the first place – you know, it kind of reached the point where the phone wasn’t ringing anymore, to be brutally truthful, and I went, you know what, I have got to start doing something that is really meaningful to me, so I started to write, I started to write novels and rediscovered that fire that originally got Explorers written.

KH: That’s great. So do you have any amusing anecdotes from Explorers you can share?

EL: Ok so there’s the grips that were peeing in the creek, that’s one, and Ethan Hawke broke his ankle riding dirt bikes with River Phoenix, so he had to do the rest of the film in a cast, you know, that sort of Jackie Chan thing, where they make it look like a shoe? So he was in a cast for the last part of the film and they had to hide it through production. Arh, let’s see, O boy, that maybe it. I’m sure I’ll think of something, if I think of something I’ll email you.

KH: That’s cool.

EL: Oh you know who was great to work with? James Cromwell as Wolfgang’s Dad. To see his career just skyrocket was fantastic. I ran into him two years ago, he was giving a lecture or a dramatic reading in Los Angeles here, and I went and I said, hey, I don’t know if you remember me but I wrote Explorers, and his face lit up. So it was great to see him again after all these years.

KH: Yes – is the bug bomb in the basement?

EL: (laughter) Yes, right, exactly.

KH: Did you pinch anything from the set?

EL: Oh boy, no, no I can’t think of anything right off the top of my head. There was no real – you know, when I went up to ILM, they had the miniature Thunder Road and all that stuff, but that was under lock and key, I couldn’t get any of that. I see some great online home kits of the Thunder Road, one in particular, the guy made decals and everything, it was a perfect replica, but I don’t have it. Someday, someday.

KH: I just wondered, cause I have interviewed other filmmakers and they say, hey you gotta do it – that stuff is worth a fortune today.

EL: if I had been thinking at the time, yeah I would’ve, but I was being very good about everything, I didn’t want to rock the boat, I was pretty young at the time.

I tell you though, a lot of the experiences the, you know, like the post-production and mixing the sound I was able use in Interference, in my audio book. I went back and remembered a lot of those – like there’s one chapter in there about a guy who’s kind of washed up and on his way out and used to do, you know, like Roger Corman type movies, and that whole chapter, all of that detail is from talking with Joe about that whole time and that sort of West Hollywood washed out, you know, sound stages and really low budget, backstreet Hollywood feel, was all based on that, sitting down with those sound mixers and all those post-production guys who’d been doing it forever, since the old days, since the 1950’s, 1940’s – so I was able to use all that detail later on.

But no physical objectives that I stole off the set that I can remember.

KH: Well Mr Luke it has been truly a pleasure talking with you. Explorers is a very dear film to me, and I have enjoyed immensely conversing with, ultimately, the creator of it.

EL: Thank you so much, this is really a lot of fun and again, it’s so great after all these years to be recalling it.

 

That was Eric Luke ladies and gentlemen – and it was extraordinarily humbling for this fan of Explorers to talk with him. I have been seeing other articles on Explorers popping up online lately so I figured it was a good time to type up this interview.

It is a grand experience and I believe to this day, it is something we all wish we could do. Both in terms of the story, being gifted with a vision that enables you to ascend to dizzying heights, and for those of us that write, to have one of our dreams picked up by those in the halls of power in Hollywood, to have them read our adventures, to look us in the eye and say: “Tonight, we launch.”

 

COMING SOON: IS THAT YOUR FIRST NAME OR YOUR LAST NAME? REMEBERING DEATHSTALKER 2 WITH JIM WYNORSKI BY KENT HILL

The Sentinal: A Review by Nate Hill 

The Sentinel is one of the weirdest thing you’ll ever see. It’s less of a horror and more just a parade of bizarro world situations strung together loosely by a vague haunted apartment story. A young model (Christina Baines) has found a sweet deal on an uptown flat, inhabited by only herself and a blond priest (John Carradine). It’s just too bad that when a deal seems to good to be true in these kinds of movies, there’s almost always some kind of sinister agenda behind it. It’s not too long before spooky stuff comes along, starting with strange physical problems, creepy encounters with her odd lesbian neighbors, flashbacks to her attempted suicide and psychic disturbances that can’t be explained. She soon realizes that she has been brought to this building for a very specific and decidedly sinister reason. The way I described all that sounds kind of routine and pedestrian, but trust me when I say that there’s nothing generic or run of the mill about this absurdity of a film. Everything has a very disconcerting and surreal feel to it, particularly in a whopper of a climax where a portal to hell is opened and all sorts of babbling loonies pour out, deformed, whacked out and adorned in some of the most creatively gross practical effects that will give your gag reflex a solid workout. The film also speckled with a diverse group of actors, some of them quite young looking when you remember that this was 1977. A chatty Eli Wallach shows up as a detective, with a youthful Christopher Walken in tow as his partner, Ava Gardner of all people has a cameo, and watch for Burgess Meredith, Jerry Orbach, Beverly D’Angelo, William Hickey, Jeff Goldblum, Richard Dreyfuss, Chris Sarandon, and Tom Berenger in what must have been one of his very first gigs, a literal walk on part. Very distinct and memorable film, one that pushed the boundaries considering the time period, and never let’s the weirdness mellow down for a single minute. 

THE HUGHES BROTHERS’ DEAD PRESIDENTS — A REVIEW BY NICK CLEMENT

2Hugely ambitious, extremely tough and gritty, and telling a story of massive scope that might’ve benefited from at least 30 more minutes of screen time, the 1995 war/crime hybrid Dead Presidents was the extra-stylish and hot-blooded follow-up for sibling filmmakers Allen and Albert Hughes, who had conquered cinema a few years previous with the crimes-in-Compton classic Menace II Society. Larenz Tate was absolutely sensational in the lead role of a lifetime, playing a young high school student on the cusp of graduation who ships off to Vietnam as a new Marine, sees some absolutely horrendous stuff on the battlefield, and comes home a changed and scarred individual, leading to a life of petty crime before taking on something much larger, something he probably knows he can’t fully control. The superb supporting cast, including Chris Tucker, Keith David, Terrence Howard, and Bokeem Woodbine (to name just a few) all delivered fierce performances, while the film itself was greatly bolstered by Lisa Rinzler’s muscular and brooding cinematography, and through one of Danny Elfman’s most atypical musical scores. Reviews were mixed and box office returns were only decent, but the film looks five times as large as its reported $10 million budget, and the balance of action, violence, romance and social/family commentary was all extremely well-calibrated. Available as a $5 DVD or as a streaming option via Amazon.

3

Paul Verhoeven’s Hollow Man: A Review by Nate Hill 

Paul Verhoeven’s Hollow Man is one of the most scummy, awful, overblown ridiculous shit masquerading as a movie that I’ve ever had the misfortune to see. It’s also entertaining on a level that suffocates you with unpleasantness and knowing stupidity at every turn. Verhoeven has taken what could have been a fascinating and suspenseful premise and turned it into a one note, bottom feeding genre pile of piss that is pretty hard to sit through. Scientifically inaccurate (not that that matters in this terrain) relentlessly unpleasant, super awkward and an all round disaster, it’s still pretty compelling to witness, like a school bus on fire. It’s a wreck to be sure, but there’s plenty of glee to be found, if you’re feeling masochistic. Kevin Bacon has laid down a path of many asshole characters over the years, but Dr. Sebastian Caine just takes the cake. He’s an egotistical, psycho sexual maniac in charge of an underground research lab, working on a brand new cheeseball formula to make the invisible man. He’s creepy and possessive with his girlfriend  (poor Elizabeth Shue) callous to his lab staff (Josh Brolin included, before his second coming, as well as Kim Dickens) and an all around jerk off. But that’s really nothing compared to what happens when the formula works, effectively turning him invisible, with a few nasty side effects. He goes from a nasty dude to an all out monster as he starts to arbitrarily prey and perv out on his co workers in their underground bunker, going full on Lon Chaney with a side of Ted Bundy in a grating performance that is a career sinkhole for Bacon. I read Ebert give golden praise to the special effects in a scene where he teansforms from visible to invisible, but i have no idea what he was smoking that day because they are an abysmal effort. Verhoeven always has a sort of knowing layer of hedonism blanketing his work, but this one takes it to a whole new level. Hey, at least there’s a cameo from the always welcome William Devane! The rest is just a vomitorium. There’s a sequel floating around out there with Christian Slater, I’m curious but have never have come across a copy. 

Absentia: A Review by Nate Hill 

You’ll think twice about taking that shortcut through through the tunnel on your way home from work after watching Absentia, a spooky little indie with its heart in the right place and the filmmaking talent to back it up. There’s a tunnel that’s home to some unspeakable scuttling fiend in a local neighborhood, and two sisters who live nearby, as well as a few unfortunate other folks, stray directly into it’s path. Pregnant Tricia (Courtney Bell) and her younger sister Calley (Catherine Parker) are just trying to get by, literally and figuratively, but every routine trip into this hellish part of the neighborhood ends in disappearances, freaky apparitions from a spindly Doug Jones, this time not playing the monster, and tragic loss of life. I won’t give away what the threat is or what it even looks like (you’ll piss your pants), and such is the beauty of a minimalist scarefest like this. You go in not knowing much beyond the hype or word of mouth, and have your pants scared off. There’s a wonderfully atmospheric score at play here, no psycho strings of operatic swells, the film instead favoring a quiet, emotional melody that contrasts the extremely bleak story arc and grim happenings rather nicely. Jones is the only prolific actor we see here, but his work amounts to not much more than a cameo anyway, the brunt landing on our two protagonists, and a local detective (Dave Levine) who assists them, and they all give very solid efforts. The tunnel is a pure unbridled nightmare though, the fates of those who wander in something that you pray never happens to anyone ever, as you cling to whoever is closest to you on the couch (or bed, preferably). Horror should illicit some empathy from viewers as well as scare them, which will in turn be more disturbing for all. This little baby does just that with it’s characters, truly making you feel sorrow and dread for these poor people and their predicament, adding to the creep factor. A gem. 

SEASON OF THE WITCH (1973) – A REVIEW BY RYAN MARSHALL

untitled-1_12673281701

George A. Romero is – or at the very least once was – the kind of socially conscious filmmaker the horror genre is in dire need of these days. His early films are the most blunt, angry, and effective in his oeuvre; though few would deny they are rough around the edges, their energy and ambition is nonetheless infectious. Sandwiched between NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD, Romero’s little-seen sophomore effort (1971’s THERE’S ALWAYS VANILLA, a romantic comedy), and 1973’s THE CRAZIES is SEASON OF THE WITCH (known as JACK’S WIFE when it was in production, and before the distributor excised half an hour from its run-time), a surprisingly thoughtful musing on contemporary witchcraft, repressed sexuality and the patriarchy; an endlessly fascinating, mostly successful marriage of talky, sleazy soap opera aesthetics and surreal psych-out horror.

Joan Mitchell is a bored housewife facing a mid-life crisis. Her husband Jack has little time for intimacy, there’s a considerable distance she feels between herself and their daughter Nikki, and she has recurring nightmares in which Jack aggressively pays her no mind and she envisions herself as a pale-faced old hag. The psychotherapist she’s been regularly seeing feeds her the same old crap in response to her attempts to understand these dreams (“The only one imprisoning Joanie…is Joanie.”), Nikki’s seeing more action in her week than Joan surely has in years, and things are just overall rather drab.

595

If nothing else, Joan’s got her circle of friends – a tightly knit community of fellow housewives who seem to share many of her anxieties. One evening at a dinner party, there’s talk of a new woman on the block that practices witchcraft. Joan, along with her closest friend Shirley, seeks her out and gets a Tarot reading, which surely opens up a couple of doors for them both. As Jack goes away on business, leaving her to her own devices, and terrible nightmares – in which a masked assailant breaks into the house and rapes her – continue to plague Joan’s mind, she dabbles in the occult as a way of reclaiming her sanity.

It wouldn’t be revealing too much to say that this is a film about – many things, but most importantly – a woman transcending her role in the household and discovering a new identity that has, in fact, been with her all along. Sexual identity, as is the case when Joan starts an affair with a teacher at Nikki’s school who had previously seduced her daughter as well and finds solace in the young man’s spirit, and personal identity go hand-in-hand. There’s also an emphasis on the pointlessness of the so-called “necessities” of life when one doesn’t truly believe in them, and at the beginning of this tale, Joan doesn’t believe in much of anything.

witchtools1

As evidenced in the opening dream sequence, Romero gives it you straight in regards to what the themes are here – to a fault, it could be argued, as Joan wearing a leash and collar, led on by Jack, and being locked inside a cage is a bit much – but regardless of how obvious they may be, they remain as relevant now as they were then. There’s a lot more dialogue than action, to be sure, but this is the kind of film where all the talking somehow manages to get us somewhere in the end, somewhere that feels on a whole satisfying and even intellectually stimulating. Audiences didn’t embrace the film upon its initial release, though Romero can hardly be faulted; marketed as some of kind of softcore porno in its severely cut form as HUNGRY WIVES, it would be difficult to make something this smart and genuinely challenging seem exciting to purveyors of provocation. Romero’s original 120-minute version may have been left on the cutting room floor but what resurfaced in 2005 with the help of the good folks at Anchor Bay seems like a damn fine representation of his intentions in its own right. We’ve changed with the times, and the time for SEASON OF THE WITCH is now. Better late than never, as they say.

At the very least, this is an ambitious cinematic cocktail, and for the most part it works. No doubt most people won’t find it to be all that visually stimulating, but if it really is about what you do with what you’ve got, Romero is a miracle worker. As cinematographer and editor as well as writer/director, he establishes an intoxicating rhythm early on that luckily remains consistent throughout – there are some really neat tricks employed during the post-production stage, as well as some creative camera movements which keep the proceedings from becoming mundane, even when the story doesn’t seem to be moving forward. This is a chilly film, perfect for viewing during the Fall season, and once Donavan’s titular song blares over an occult shopping spree, Romero’s unique alchemy has all but won you over. It’s very much of its time – the fashion, the unquestionably ugly décor, the hep terminology – and appreciation may vary based on one’s tolerance of this kind of stuff, but a thoughtful viewer will surely find plenty to chew on here, if not even more to swallow.

2632699948_ff45f27beb1

RICHARD LINKLATER’S EVERYBODY WANTS SOME — A REVIEW BY NICK CLEMENT

3

Richard Linklater’s Everybody Wants Some is a fun and amiable college-set comedy about a group of baseball players going to school in Texas who spend the first few days of the new school year getting wasted, chasing the ladies, and generally acting like a bunch of horny and rambunctious clowns. Set in 1980 and filled with wall-to-wall classic rock hits and all sorts of hilarious wardrobe and production design, the film does feel, to a certain degree, like Linklater’s “spiritual sequel” to his far greater and more ambitious high school classic Dazed and Confused. But if Everybody Wants Some lacks that film’s overriding sense of lightning-in-a-bottle-magic, the bros in his newest tale are fun to hang with (to a certain extent…), the drug humor is funny, the ball-busting on display is frequently inspired, and the women are all very, very attractive. Slight, modest, and totally in love with itself from first frame to last, Everybody Wants Some benefits from it’s mostly unknown cast of charismatic actors hiding behind ridiculous mustaches, and feels like yet another effortless extension of Linklater’s idea of unassuming, organic cinema.

2